Intel has built an experimental fully programmable 48-core chip that it’s nicknamed the Single-Chip Cloud Computer (SCC) and means to build at least a hundred more to pass out to industry and academic partners to use to develop new software applications and parallel programming models.

Microsoft, ETH Zurich, the University of California at Berkeley and the University of Illinois already have one and researchers from Intel, HP and Yahoo’s Open Cirrus initiative have already begun porting cloud applications to the widget using Hadoop, the Java software framework that supports data-intensive distributed applications.

Internally Intel has ported web servers, physics modeling and financial analytics to the thing.

Intel says SCC, which runs Windows and Linux and so legacy software, is a research platform meant to work out the many kinks of multi-headed programming. It will never be a product.

However, Intel means to start integrating key features of the work in a new line of Core-branded chips early next year and introduce six- and eight-core processors later in 2010.

The SCC dingus – the most x86 engines ever pushed onto a single sliver of silicon – only consumes 25W-125W with all its little cores chugging away at maximum performance.

That’s the equivalent of a couple of light bulbs – or a Nehalem chip – thanks to newly invented fine-grain power management techniques and Intel believes it could reshape how computers are built and how people interact with their PCs and personal devices.

SCC incorporates technologies such as the power management and scale-out message-passing intended to scale to 100 cores and beyond but before such a device can go mainstream Intel’s got to understand better how to schedule and coordinate many cores.

Once that problem’s linked it believes laptops will be able to see objects and motion as it happens the same way a human being does and with a high degree of accuracy.

It says to imagine a world without keyboards, remote controls or joysticks because computers may be able to read brain waves, so simply thinking about a command, such as dictating words, would happen without speaking.

Or, if you figure you’ll be dead before that happens, imagine shopping online and seeing a “mirror” of yourself wearing the clothes you’re interested in and twirling to see how the fabric drapes and checking if the color complements your skin tone.

Very Jules Verne and gee-whiz but not any problem Intel is immediately trying to solve. It’s really trying to squeeze a container-based data center Cinderella-style into a rack.

Intel says it calls the futuristic chip a Single-Chip Cloud Computer because architecturally it resembles the organization of data centers used to create a cloud of computing resources over the Internet.

That means tens to thousands of computers connected by a physically cabled network, distributing large tasks and massive datasets in parallel. The chip uses the same approach, but all the computers and networks are integrated on a single piece of 45nm, high-k metal-gate silicon about the size of a postage stamp, dramatically reducing the amount of physical computers needed to create a cloud data center.

There’s a high-speed 256 GB/s network between the cores in the chip that Intel says significantly improves the communications performance and energy efficiency of the current data center model, since data packets only have to move a few millimeters on-chip instead of tens of meters to another computer system.

Applications will be able to use this low-latency mesh network to pass information directly between cooperating cores in microseconds, reducing the need to access data in slower off-chip system memory. Applications can also dynamically manage exactly which cores are used for a given task at a given time.

Each of the cores can run an operating system and Intel says software can turn each of the cores off and on and match their voltage and clock speed levels to the needs of the moment. Each dual core or tile can have its own frequency and groups of four tiles or eight cores can run at their own voltage.

In a canned quote, Dan Reed, Microsoft’s corporate VP of extreme computing, remarked that “Our early research with the single chip cloud computer prototype has already identified many opportunities in intelligent resource management, system software design, programming models and tools, and future application scenarios.”

David Andersen, assistant professor of computer science at Carnegie Mellon, figures “the chip’s massive parallelism gives us the ability to investigate, today, the degree of parallelism that will be needed from applications five years down the line to make the best use of emerging many-core platforms.”

The prototype, an x86 follow-on to the 80-core non-x86 Polaris chip Intel unveiled two years ago, was developed by Intel Labs in Bangalore, India, Braunschweig, Germany and Hillsboro, Oregon as part of the company’s Tera-scale Computing Research Program.

Intel says it will detail the widget’s 24 dual-core or tile architecture and circuits in a paper to be presented at the International Solid State Circuits Conference in February.

Apparently the 1.3 billion-transistor concept chip, as Intel calls it, shares some attributes with Intel’s upcoming Larrabee GPU microarchitecture but not its cache-coherent design.

Tilera has a 100-core chip that it expects to put out next year.

Cisco and EMC Tuesday kicked off a cloud-chasing joint venture called Acadia that includes VMware and Intel as minority investors.

Presumably they took the name from the ancient Greeks who used the word to mean a refuge or idyllic place and not the uprooted and deported North American Acadia captured in Longfellow’s magnificent tear-jerker “Evangeline,” although Cisco’s new enemies IBM and HP may try to persuade users that it is.

Anyway, Cisco, EMC and VMware – with at least the encouragement of their silent partner Intel – have also formed what they call the Virtual Computing Environment coalition to push on-premise and hosted private cloud computing created out of Cisco’s Intel Xeon-based Unified Computing Systems (UCS) and networking, EMC’s storage and security and VMware’s virtualization to large accounts and service providers through third parties.

The coalition, which will claim more of their resources, talent and investment than the joint venture, will consist of an ecosystem of VARs, service providers, channel partners and ISVs and to start includes the big system integrators Accenture, Capgemini, CSC, Lockheed Martin, Tata Consulting Services and Wipro.

It’s supposed to advance Cisco’s fortunes in the data center against IBM and HP, both of which are ticked at Cisco’s temerity in daring to try to break into servers – and neither is likely to be any happier with this alliance. Their only consolation may be that Cisco’s boxes haven’t gotten a ringing endorsement from users – at least not yet.

What they might like even less, however, is EMC CEO Joe Tucci’s contention that no one company can deliver everything that’s needed in this leg of technology and that he and his mates have a major leg up on the kind of collegiality that will be needed going forward, the kind of partnership that – according to Cisco CEO John Chambers – “will change the data center and the cloud forever.”

The three companies are going to be pooling their roadmaps and sharing and relinquishing control of their most sacred customer information to each other. And Chambers said the “leap of faith” involved in such a situation “begins at the top,” adding “I trust Joe with my life.” Chambers, by the way, once worked for Tucci and their relationship goes back decades.

McKinsey estimates that the market they’re shooting for will be worth $85 billion by 2015, or 20% of worldwide spending on data center infrastructure and services.

Acadia is characterized as an accelerator for users that want to get out of the blocks fast. It and the coalition are going to peddle and support what are called Vblock infrastructure packages – integrated, tested, validated, ready-to-grow configurations of the quartet’s virtualization, networking, computing, storage, security and management technologies.

The companies say that early Vblock customer trials have delivered up to 40% reductions in the cost of operating and managing virtualized data center infrastructures, a major come-on.

The first kits out the door this quarter from third parties include a mid-range Vblock 1 and a high-end Vblock 2. An entry-level Vblock 0 is due next year.

Vblock 2 supports 3,000-6,000 virtual machines and is built out of Cisco’s UCS boxes and Nexus 1000v and Multilayer Directional Switches (MDS); EMC’s Symmetrix V-Max storage and RSA security; and VMware’s vSphere platform.

Vblock 1 supports 800-3,000 virtual machines and uses EMC’s CLARiiON storage.

Vblock 0, when it gets here, will support 300-800 virtual machines and use EMC’s Unified Storage. It will target medium-sized businesses, small data centers or organizations and be used for test and development by channel partners, systems integrators, service providers, ISVs and customers.

Pricing on Vblock, which won’t brook any substitutions of outside hardware or software, is hard to pin down because each account will be different but will range from hundreds of thousands to many millions of dollars.

The companies said the widgetry can scale with additional computer and storage claiming that’s a key differentiator compared to other people’s monolithic systems.

Their calling card will be virtualization because it’s the hinge on which the whole door swings. VMware CEO Paul Maritz says that the triumvirate is also working to ensure that users can get out of the cloud as well as into it. It’s not meant to be, as the song says, the Hotel California from which there is no escape.

EMC has also come up with Ionix Unified Infrastructure Manager for Vblock, which is designed to support a wide range of enterprise management consoles. EMC’s RSA security is layered on the Vblock architecture for policy management of identity, data and infrastructure but doesn’t mean the customer has to reduce the security software it already has in place.

The companies mean to bring out other Vblock packages including virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI).

Chambers said the companies are working on “seven or eight things,” but identified none of them.

Besides pre-sales, the coalition will hawk a bunch of professional services including a Cloud-based Business Advisory Service, Private Cloud Strategic Impact Advisory Service, Private Cloud Architecture Impact Advisory Service, Virtual Desktop Advisory Service, Cloud Computing Strategy Service, and Vblock Design and Implementation Service.

Acadia, meanwhile, is supposed to build, initially operate and ultimately transfer Vblock infrastructure to the customers, half of which are likely to be end users and half service providers.

The engagements – and they’re only talking about a “modest number” of accounts that want to get up fast – should run from 18 months to three years. The companies see Acadia as something of a knowledge repository, heavy on white papers, and training. There will be problem re-creation labs. It should begin customer operations in Q1. It reportedly has no signed contracts yet.

The infrastructure-as-a-service Acadia venture will have its own CEO but the companies haven’t picked him yet. They’re recruiting. Otherwise Acadia will consist of 130 people described as the trio’s “top talent.”

The companies aren’t explaining how much was or will be invested in the venture or by whom only that EMC and Cisco are the principals.

The coalition’s management is more amorphous. Supposedly the three CEOs are running it; more practically they’ve delegated their senior lieutenants to see it thrives day-to-day, folks like Howard Elias and Pat Gelsinger and in turn Dennis Hoffman at EMC, Gary Moore and Rob Lloyd and in turn Manjula Talreja at Cisco and Brian Byun at VMware. This bears watching to see how it shakes out since there’s no real quarterback.

Where EMC’s Atmos cloud widgetry may or may not fit in the grand scheme of things is unclear.

Based on broad hints from the companies, which were already joined at the hip, the Wall Street Journal got wind of the joint venture in September and said it was code named Alpine. They’ve reportedly been working on it for the last three-and-a-half years, intently the last six months.

Intel is buying Wind River for roughly $884 million in cash, $11.50 a share, a 44% premium.

The move into software will give Intel VxWorks, Wind River’s proprietary and multi-core-ready RTOS, and its commercial-grade Linux operating system as well as its middleware and software design and device testing tools.

Wind River claims to be the global leader in Device Software Optimization (DSO) and enable companies to develop, run and manage device software faster, better, more reliably and for less money from concept to deployed product.

Intel, which created and released the Linux-based Moblin operating system for Atom-based netbooks to the Linux Foundation – reportedly with help from Wind River – says it wants the embedded operating systems house to back its play in embedded systems and mobile handheld devices so it can be more independent of the old traditional who-knows-where-they’re-going PC and server markets.

That means stuff like smart phones, mobile Internet devices (MIDs), consumer electronic devices, in-car “info-tainment” systems, networking equipment and aerospace and defense, energy, a multibillion-dollar market.

Wind River will become a wholly owned subsidiary and continue doing what it’s doing with its widgetry more tightly aligned to Intel platforms going forward.

Wind River CEO Ken Klein, however, said the company would still support multiple hardware architectures.

Wind River does business with Intel rivals such as ARM, Broadcom, Freescale, IBM, NEC, Qualcomm, Sun, TI and Xilinx.

The acquisition is supposed to close this summer. The unit will report into Intel’s Software and Services Group, headed by Renee James.

Wind River did $359.7 million in revenues, up 9.5%, in the year ended in January earning $10.8 million after losing $2.4 million the year before. In March, it said fiscal 2010 revenue should be $360 million-$380 million.

It’s been around since 1981 and has 1,600 employees worldwide. It claims thousands of customers including Alcatel-Lucent, BMW, Boeing, Bombardier Transportation, Mitsubishi, Motorola, NASA, Sony and Verizon.

With demand sucking wind and an inventory stockpile still to sell, Intel said late Wednesday that it would shutter five manufacturing operations – two assembly test facilities in Malaysia and one in the Philippines as well as a 200mm wafer fabrication plant in Oregon and wafer production in California, a move that will affect 5,000-6,000 employees, some of whom will be offered transfers.

It will take the company, which said it was aligning its manufacturing capacity to current market conditions, until the end of the year to act and will not impact its 42nm manufacturing or its move to 32nm.

The semiconductor giant is said to be contemplating a Q1 loss.

In an internal webcast last week Intel CEO Paul Otellino apparently raised the specter that the company may suffer its first loss in 22 years this quarter.

Last week Intel reported Q4 earnings down 90% on revenues down 23% and said conditions are so murky it dare not project ahead.

According to Bloomberg and later the Wall Street Journal, Otellini told employees the first quarter is “too close to call” and warned that “We are not going to wake up in six months with everything rosy again.”

He said the company was going to slow production, which would force it to close some sites and relocate some production workers.

Intel has publicly expressed confidence that margins will return to “healthy” levels in the second half. Rather than give Q1 guidance it said it was using $7 billion in revenues for “internal planning purposes” and a gross margin in the “low 40s.” If it goes to 40% the numbers run red.

© 2012 LinuxGram Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha