Red Hat handed out a new permission slip first thing Tuesday morning, saying that its Advanced Platform Premium and Server Premium subscribers are entitled to Red Hat Cloud Access.

In other words, they’re free to move their supported RHEL widgetry between traditional on-premise servers and Amazon Web Services via EC2. Other Certified Cloud Providers will follow in due course.

Red Hat’s been beta’ing RHEL on Amazon for two-and-a-half years now. Product strategy director Mike Ferris called it a beta as in business model.

A couple of strings with the Cloud Access program though. The fine print says to qualify customers need a minimum of 25 “active, unused” subscriptions and a direct (L1-L3) relationship with Red Hat support. Third-party support makes them ineligible. Red Hat Academic Program and desktop customers can’t cut it either.

Red Hat will be keeping tabs on the number of subscriptions that are used in the cloud and says “once subscriptions are moved to the cloud, they must remain there for a minimum of six months.”

Shouldn’t Oracle Be Doing This?

So VMware and Salesforce’s heralded little secret is a joint Java cloud for developers. A little off the beaten tract for Salesforce whose own widgetry is based on a proprietary Apex language and who isn’t exactly in the developer-catering business but a sensible, non-competitive infrastructure consort for VMware, who’s got to justify its odd $420 million acquisition of SpringSource, the open source-based Java framework, and latch onto the developer base before it drifts off to Azure or some other cloud.

It’s called the first mission-critical deployment environment for enterprise Java apps in the cloud. It’s still in the oven though and won’t be available as developer preview until later this year when pricing will be announced.

This “enterprise” cloud will be called VMforce and will ride on Salesforce’s Force.com platform. The two companies say they’re both going to sell and support the thing, targeting the six million-odd Java developers that are supposed to be out there, including the two million-odd developers using the Spring framework, and get them building so-called Cloud 2 apps that are social – or at least collaborative – and work on any mobile device like the iPad in real-time.

They say VMforce will “dramatically simplify how enterprises and enterprise Java developers can harness the economics of cloud computing without compromising the flexibility, control and choice they require.”

According to a canned statement attributed to VMware CEO Paul Maritz, “Companies are looking for solutions that deliver the benefits of cloud computing while leveraging existing resources, expertise and infrastructure. By creating a dramatically simplified solution for modern application development, VMforce is a significant step forward in offering our customers a path that bridges existing internal investments with the resources and flexibility of the cloud.”

VMforce is supposed to support standard Java code, such as plain old Java objects (POJOs), Java Server Pages (JSPs) and Java servlets, through the Spring Framework. Java apps built with Spring promise to be easy to port to VMforce and vice versa. VMforce is supposed to make them scale automatically.

It’s also supposed to be global and obviously provide a vSphere-based virtualization platform as well as orchestration and management technology, a relational cloud database, a development platform and collaboration services, application run-time, development framework and tooling.

Naturally Red Hat, which wants to compete with VMware, thinks JBoss is a better app development platform for the cloud, that it is easier, seamless, has a broader user base, and a broader range of apps can be developed.

VMforce will use the Spring Framework and the Eclipse-based SpringSource Tool Suite. VMforce apps will run on the tc Server run-time, the enterprise version of Apache Tomcat, the lightweight application server that’s supposed to optimized for virtual and cloud environments.

As part of Force.com, the apps will have access to Salesforce’s newfangled Chatter Services, its Facebook-like collaboration widgetry. And as part of Force.com, developers will have access to its pre-built business services that can be configured into their apps without any custom coding, stuff like search, identity and security, workflow, reporting and analytics, a Web Services integration API and mobile deployment.

VMware’s vCloud technology is supposed to automatically manage the software stack that powers VMforce applications. It’s called the Java applications’ onramp to the cloud, automating their wiring to the Force.com database and managing the underlying vSphere virtualization platform.

VMware & Salesforce Percolate Java Cloud
Microsoft To Get Royalties on Android
Verizon & Novell To Pitch Identity-as-a-Service
Red Hat Strikes Deeper into Amazon
Something for Everybody: All-in-One IaaS-PaaS-SaaS
NComputing Fields $200 ‘Thin Client’
Microsoft FAT Patent Upheld
Google Wrestles with Cloud Printing
Apple Confirms Intrinsity Acquisition
Swiss Cops Foil Reported IBM Bomb Plot
They Say iPhone’s Next Feature Will Be a High-Decibel Scream ‘Help, Help, I’ve Been Kidnapped’
Jobs to Adobe: ‘Yer Stinkin’ Flash is Over-the-Hill. Get Over It.’
Document Management Heads to the Cloud
Intel Updates Kids’ Laptop
Amazon Opens Singapore Cloud Data Center
Asus To Release Android Tablet
iPad No Longer Contraband in Israel
Will the Intel-AMD Duopoly Have To Squeeze Over on the Throne?
Google Loses Market Share in China
Intel Puts Money into Mexico
And How Many Does Microsoft Have…
Hedge Fund Hangs in There
NTT Com Runs with KVM
Baby Fennec for Android
High-Tech Job Losses Counted
IBM Ups Dividend
Microsoft Contributes to Open Source CMS Project
Eucalyptus Spreads to Windows
Apprendra To Claim Vforce for .NET
Sic Transit Gloria Mundi
Microsoft Kills Courier
How Wide & Deep Amazon
Google’s Bound for the Boob Tube
SCO Puts Papers in for Retrial

Google, which has got more secrets than the CIA, has just bought that mystery outfit Agnilux that the PA Semi guys who didn’t fit into Apple – or picked up their winnings from Apple’s $278 million 2008 acquisition of PA and moved on to the next crap game– are supposed to have started.

Nobody knows what Agnilux is doing.

A couple of months ago the New York Times was told by an ex-PA person that Agnilux was working on a server and repeated scuttlebutt that it had a partnership in place with Cisco.

Well, Google does love to build its own servers. But since PA Semi apparently provided the A4 ARM chip for the iPad, maybe it’s reinventing that wheel for Google. Or maybe it’s working on something brand new!!!

Nah. After poking around a little and sending out a few e-mails we heard from the brotherhood that Amarjit Gil, co-founder and VP of sales at PA Semi, who mostly helped close the fab deal with TI based on old personal connections, and Mark Hayter, who ran PA’s board group, something like system architect and senior director of platform hardware, although mostly he just wrote some documentation, left Apple together and started the company to do a tablet.

Fancy that.

It’s assumed they self-funded the beginnings based on proceeds from their past participation in SiByte and PA.

Reports online indicate Olaf Johannson, reputed to be a darn good Linux internals guy and Todd Broch, an all-around software guy, also piled in.

The source said he didn’t know who else was involved, but “I do know that those four couldn’t design a chip to save their lives.” They could however, he felt, “cobble together an interesting platform demo from off-the-shelf components and open source software.”

Ah-ha, well, Agnilux, which is supposed to mean “Firelight,” but could just as easily mean “lamb’s light” if they stuck to just one language, has reportedly included ex-PA chief Dan Dobberpuhl, father of the Alpha and the StrongARM chips, since late last year.

That suggests that Google’s buying Dobberpuhl. What’s good enough for Apple….

The motley crew is also supposed to include some ex-Cisco engineers and a TiVo software architect.

The Times eventually abandoned its server story and, saying things were “coming into sharper focus,” reported hearing that Google bought Agnilux for “help with porting Google platforms like its Chrome and Android operating systems onto other devices – like tablets, or possibly even television set-top boxes.”

“‘These are systems guys focusing on hardware-software integration,’” it was told by a source. “‘It’s not chip design. It’s getting software platforms to wok on different kinds of hardware with lots of obscure back-end technologies.’”

Another source told it Agnilux had a lot of power efficiency expertise – presumably derived from the PA adventure – that could help Google get its software on tablets without draining the battery.

Meanwhile, Apple recently bought Texas-based Intrinsity, which specializes in power-efficient ARMs et al, purportedly to fill in its PA losses.

Andy Bechtolsheim, the golden-touch co-founder of Sun Microsystems, who was Google’s first investor and spent six years at Cisco developing high-speed network switches based on a company he sold them for a few hundred million, has thrown down the gauntlet to his former employer.

Arista Networks, one of his start-ups where he’s chairman and chief development officer, has started rolling out a chassis-based 10GbE switch with 364 wirespeed ports good for an aggregate 10 TBit/sec switching capacity called the Arista 7500 that’s supposed to be hands-down better in every way than anything around.

In fact, it’s supposed to have a three to 10 times overall advantage. Arista figures it’s five times faster, a tenth the power draw per wirespeed port and half the footprint of other modular data center switches.

Arista is so taken with its device it calls it “transformational” and claims it “ushers in the next phase of the data center industry.”

The best Cisco’s got is a fatter power hog with a measly 64 ports that sells for 10 times the roughly $1,200 a port that Arista’s asking. That’s $460,800 fully configured Arista 7500 versus $13.7 million for a similar Cisco Nexus set-up.

It will also compete with Juniper, Force10 and Brocade.

Arista says the air-cooled 7500 was specifically designed for cloud computing, virtualization, and mission-critical data centers. One of its widgets, which are packaged in a rack-mounted 11U, is supposed to handle a cloud-like 8,000 servers with over 100,000 cores and way, way more if four of them are lashed together.

CEO Jayshree Ullal, late of Cisco, where she was head of its $10 billion network switching business, claims, “Cloud networking requires a new class of scale, price/performance, and resilience previously not addressed with existing modular switches.”

The Arista 7500, a follow-on to the Arista 7048 and 7100 introduced last year, supports an unprecedented L2/L3 throughput of 5.76 billion data packets a second in a single chassis – figure 3.4ms port-to-port with 64 byte packets – and it’s meant to deliver 40Gbps and 100Gbps Ethernet interfaces next year.

The 7500 runs Arista’s modular Linux-based Extensible Operating System (EOS), said to have a special multi-process, state-sharing architecture. It’s also unusually open and, unlike Cisco or Juniper, provides a single binary image across all of Arista’s widgets.

The 7500 starts at $140,000 (off-the-shelf components don’t you know). Arista says it is in production already with two customers for revenue. Dell has made purring noises so apparently it’s going to handle it.

Bechtolsheim and his partner David Cheriton have funded Arista to the tune of $100 million. The 1U 7100 picked up a reported 300 customers, a lot of them speed-freak Wall Street accounts.

It says it means to IPO.

‘You Call That a Switch? Nah, THIS is a Switch’: Arista
Oracle Slaps a Microsoft Tax on ODF
What Did Google Just Buy & What For?
Microsoft Recruits Facebook To Counter Google Apps
Adobe Concedes Match to Apple
Microsoft Says Businesses Spending Beginning
Operating System? Operating System? Who Needs an Operating System?
VMware Beats the Street
Gosling Hints He Left Oracle over Money
Chinese Hackers Pinched the Tollgate on Google’s Cloud
HP Pisses on Cisco’s Shoes
Awww, a Cloud Marriage: Jigsaw Sells Out to Salesforce
Steve Jobs Walks on Water
RightScale To Try Behavior Modification’
Cloud Communications Alliance Formed
Cloud Skeptic Buys Cloud Concern
Alleged Insider Trading Ringleader Resists Additional Charges
Oracle & the iPad
SQL Server 2008 R2 Goes to Manufacturing
SCO Asks Judge To Overturn Jury Verdict
Microsoft Testing Cloud PC Management
Red Hat Drops Xen

Enterprise-wide data warehouses and data marts are big and bulky yet lack 90% of the relevant data floating around a company; they’re hard to access and are surrounded by lots of spooky government regulations so a lot of the people who should use them to try to figure out what’s going on don’t.

They simply don’t support all the ways companies want to massage data.

That’s what Greenplum Software says persuaded it to create Chorus, a new class of product it calls the first commercial enterprise data cloud platform and describes as a lithe tool for quickly building multiple, useable, even disposable data marts contrary to the fashion of centralized corporate data warehouses that are supposed to be the “single source of truth.”

It’s the result of an initiative the company announced last June in which flexible private cloud scalability meets massively parallel processing.

Chorus isn’t a database; it’s widgetry deployed along with a Greenplum database to create a self-service analytic infrastructure that companies can use to extract value and insight from their data.

In place of the enterprise date warehouse, Greenplum imagines analysts using all kinds of raw data, big and small, structured and unstructured – perhaps 10 times the size of the enterprise date warehouse – on the Chorus infrastructure of always-on always-accessible commodity hardware, virtual machines and even public clouds rather than something like an expensive Oracle appliance.

It imagines data services that allow analysts to discover, combine and share useful datasets in and across data marts. And, in the fashion of the day, it imagines data collaboration, complements of familiar-looking social networking capabilities that link data and data analysts to accelerate collaboration and insight.

It says the secure, controlled sandboxes Chorus creates relieve IT of the management overhead and operational complexity usually associated with data mart deployment.

Chorus is built for global scale and is powered by a Greenplum Data Hypervisor, a distributed cloud-scale execution framework that manages complex cross-database state, data movement and orchestration in a fault-tolerant and self-healing way.

T-Mobile used Chorus to pinpoint churn and is now deploying a 1PT scheme. Greenplum is expecting to capture net new sales with Chorus, a concept it figures Teradata will copy.

Greenplum doesn’t for a moment imagine Chorus replacing traditional enterprise data warehouses because it’s still in the business of peddling them and has in fact just revved its flagship Greenplum Database.

The 4.0 cut is supposed to be a major release, the culmination of more than seven years work that Greenplum believes has reached a level of maturity that it can wrestle Exadata and Teradata to the ground. It also powers the databases provisioned by Chorus.

It features dynamic query prioritization, self-healing fault tolerance, and so-called polymorphic data storage, tunable compression and support for both row- and column-oriented storage within a database.

Gosh, isn’t Google’s timing grand. In a few weeks Microsoft’s web-based versions of Word, Excel and PowerPoint will start wending their way to market. So Google, which is going to be technically outclassed, decides to drop a re-architected Google Apps public preview Monday that’s faster and chummier than what exists, collaboration supposedly being Google App’s strong suit.

The changes – it apparently took Google a year to get the new functionality to work in a browser –are supposed to make its cloud apps perform more like traditional desktop apps.

Google also reminded users that it’s going to turn off Google Gears on May 3 so they won’t be able to use Google Apps off-line for the foreseeable future.

It’s going to replace Gears with HTML 5 at some point it’s just not clear when. Google claims not that many people use the vaunted feature.

It’s also dropping support for older browsers that have slower rendering engines and don’t support the new functionality.

The various Google Apps, which all had different fathers, will now apparently share a common infrastructure.

Google has made real-time collaboration possible. Kinda like Google Wave users can now see editing changes as they’re typed character-by-character, with comments coming in over an integrated instant messenger. The widgetry will support 50 simultaneous editors, which we predict will not make it a productivity tool.

Microsoft’s competitive apps are not supposed to have real-time multi-user editing.

Google, however, has tried to make Google Apps more Microsoft-like. Docs now supports formatting options like a margin ruler, better numbering and bullets, better image placement and spell-checking as you type.

Spreadsheets have gotten a formula editing bar, cell auto-complete and drag-and-drop columns.

Uploading files to the cloud is also supposed to be easier with imported documents looking the same as they do on the desktop despite the browser used. Their formatting used to lack any uniformity.

To solve that problem Google designed its own document object model and built a new JavaScript layout engine that converts the formatting into the HTML that supported browsers like Chrome, Safari or Firefox can read consistently.

There’s also a new standalone Drawing app, which is something of a misnomer. It’s not an Etch-a-Sketch like the name implies; it’s for building PowerPoint-like flow charts, schematics and other kinds of diagrams. And it too has multi-user editing capabilities. The drawings are said to be easy to insert in a document with the text automatically flowing around them. IE users will need IE9 when it finally arrives.

Mobile Android, iPhone and Blackberry users will be able to edit spreadsheets but just read documents.

To use the preview Google Apps customers have to set the control panel option to “enable new pre-release features,” enable the new document editor in the “Document settings” page, and activate the new spreadsheet editor with the “New version” link at the top of any spreadsheet.

The update was introduced at Google’s new cloud conference for CIOs called Atmosphere.

Microsoft’s online applications are supposed to be available to business users next month and to the hoi-polloi in June.

Google Apps Re-Architected
Greenplum Sings the Next Chorus on a Data Cloud
HP Under Investigation in Germany & Russia for Bribery
Apple Checkmates Adobe
International iPad Lust Will Have To Contain Itself
Voltaire Gooses Ethernet
Oracle’s Plans for MySQL Such as They Are
Intel Earnings Up 288%
PCs Up 27% in Q1, Saith Gartner
AMD Makes Money
VMware Buys Cloud Messaging for SpringSource
Gosling Out of Oracle
VP Who Melded Sun & MySQL Turns Up at Oracle DB Rival
Xen 4.0 Out
HP Raids VMware
Nimsoft Goes On-Demand
UPS, Skype, Salesforce.com Join LotusLive
MacBooks Upgraded
VMware & Saleforce Are Up to Something
iPad Meets the gPad?
Atom Expecting Twins Again
Microsoft Outsources its IT Management
Palm Up For Sale
Gartner Moves Spending Goalposts Out
SEC Investigates Novell, Intel, HP for Insider Trading: Report
List of Galleon-Diddled Stocks Lengthens
Nexsan Shelves IPO
Amazon’s Cloud Database Floats Over to Europe
Fujitsu Sued for Defamation
No Wonder California’s Broke
IBM Open New Mainframe Plant
HP Closes 3Com Acquisition

Linux Foundation (LF) chief Jim Zemlin needed hand-holding after IBM waved some of its patents under the nose of open source mainframer TurboHercules, particularly those two allegedly penalty-free patents IBM pledged to the open source community five years ago, so he turned to LF board member Dan Frye, VP of open systems development at IBM.

Frye thereupon repeated part of IBM’s 2005 pledge closing his e-mail with the words “IBM stands by this 2005 Non-Assertion Pledge today as strongly as it did then. IBM will not sue for the infringement of any of those 500 patents by any Open Source Software.”

According to Zemlin that means “all of us can breathe easy – IBM remains true to their word.”

Jim, Jim, aside from being at variance with IBM’s other official statements he didn’t say IBM wouldn’t assert its patents – even those magic 500 – like it did. And he didn’t say it wouldn’t sue TurboHercules or any open source company for that matter using any of its zillion other unpledged patents.

You willing to bet Linux or MySQL or some other big OSS projects don’t infringe hundreds or thousands of IBM patents beyond the list of 500, maybe even some of the 171 other unpledged patents and applications sent to TurboHercules?

See http://www.linux.com/news/featured-blogs/158-jim-zemlin/299092-ibms-open-source-patent-pledge

© 2012 LinuxGram Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha