by Maureen O’Gara

Tilera, the start-up building high-performance multi-core processors that aren’t x86, laid out a roadmap Monday that will see it sampling a single processor with a hundred RISC-based cores in the first quarter of 2011 and producing the widgets a few months later.

Imagine that, 100 frigging cores.

The company believes the widget, called the TILE-Gx100, will be the world’s first general-purpose 100-core processor and says it will be adopted by major service providers, potentially folks like Facebook and maybe Google – although Google’s always the odd fish – for cloud infrastructure, dislocating the standard Intel-based cloud.

Tilera says the cloud is multi-core by nature but that it can deliver a “cloud in a rack” as opposed to an Intel “cloud in a container.”

It says it’s engaged with four of the five top IPS vendors and five of the top 10 UTM vendors while 10 universities are using Tilera as their multi-core teaching platform.

The part should also go into enterprise networking, multimedia and wireless infrastructures.

Quanta, the big Taiwan ODM, is working on some hush-hush cloud computing strategy and has just tucked $10 million into Tilera as part of the company’s $25 million C round, bringing total investment to $64 million.

Tilera doesn’t expect to be back to the trough ever again – it figures to break even in 2011 – and claims it hasn’t a clue what Quanta means to do with widgetry. Could be an ODM thingie or a Quanta-branded something or other. Perhaps its intentions will become clear in the first half.

Anyway, Tilera hasn’t been given to pre-announcing its widgetry, but since it’s become the norm with its competitors, Cavium, RMI (now NetLogic), Intel and Freescale, Tilera figures it better be fashionable.

It’s currently delivering its second-generation 32-bit TILEPro family, which has 32- and 64-cores, and its original 64-core TILE64 chips to 75 embedded customers. The gismos run SMP Linux 2.6.26, the LAMP stack, C, C++ and Java plus the ANSI C/C++ compiler, GNU tools, the Eclipse IDE and a hypervisor layer to virtualize hardware and I/O device drivers. It’s got a Multicore Development Environment (MDE) for product deployment and promises easy programming.

The Gx will be a new 64-bit family that starts at 16 cores, tops out at 100 and has chips with 36 and 64 cores in between – mind you, each of the cores is 64-bit. The line will clock at a dialed-down 750MHz-800MHz up to 1.25GHz-1.5GHz and consume 10W-55W. The 36-core part will be first out of the gate – then the 16 – and start sampling around this time next year.

The company meant to go in graduated order, but, according to marketing director Robert Doud, customer demand pushed the schedule up.

Tilera claims the Gx100 will offer the highest performance of any processor yet announced, and that includes Intel’s parts, by a factor of four. And it claims the Gx family raises the performance-per-watt bar by 10 times better compute efficiency than Intel’s next-generation Westmere chip.

Doud quips that Tilera burns less power than the fans in a dual quad-core Nehalem machine.

Compared to its own Pro64 the Gx should be good for 4x the performance and twice the power density.

The Gx100 is supposed to do 4x the Nehalem-EX’ eight cores in cloud computing; 4x Cavium’s high-end 68xx Octeon II in deep packet inspection; and 30x TI’s high-end multi-core DSP in wireless.

The company’s two-dimensional iMesh interconnect makes an on-chip bus unnecessary and its Dynamic Distributed Cache system lets each core’s local cache be shared coherently across the entire chip. That gives the Gx100 26MB of L3 cache for each core plus 32KB L1 I-cache, 32KB L1 D-cache and 256KB L2 cache for a total cache of 32GB for each chip.

Tilera claims the peer-to-peer distributed approach to cache scales and is superior to large shared memory that runs hot and creates performance bottlenecks.

Between the interconnect and the cache, the TILE architecture is supposed to scale nearly linearly with the number of cores on the chip, a feat that Tilera points out is “currently unmatched.”

Tilera CEO Omid Tahernia figures boards using dozens of chips or more will be replace by one of his chips, simplifying system architecture, reducing cost, power consumption and PC board space.

Besides this consolidation, Tilera imagines its chips being used for granularity, allowing processing resources to be allocated to functions in precise 1% increments, and determinism, letting cores or clusters of cores be dedicated to specific tasks – or virtualized applications – including cache-coherent islands of compute for predictable performance.

It should translate into lower system costs, smaller footprints and quicker time-to-market using smaller development teams.

The Gx100 also has eight 10 Gbps ports that can become 32 1Gbps Ethernet ports and two 10-lane Interlaken chip-to-chip connections. It has four on-chip DDR3 DRAM controllers and will address 1TB of DRAM with 4Gbit RAMs.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), an early Tilera investor, will build the chips on its 40nm process. At this point Tilera has the physical layout and a simulator. It expects first silicon in 2H10.

Expected volume pricing will range from ~$400 for the Gx36 to ~$1,000 for the Gx100.

With its eye on the server market and its feet currently in the embedded market, Tilera has ported and optimized Memcached, the open source widgetry used to accelerate database-driven web sites, on its chips. It could turn up in 1U rack-mounted appliances. It’ll get people associating Tilera with servers.

With IBM and Dell watching its back, Juniper strode into town Thursday like a gunslinger twirling its pearl-handled six-guns around ready to take on Cisco, the fastest gun in the West, and all the other network hombres.

The mid-sized company opened its barrage at the New York Stock Exchange, a new Juniper customer, on the 40th anniversary of ARPAnet.

It claims the Internet and its newfangled cloud progeny – which are doing things they weren’t designed to do – are cracking under the load and are going to spin out of orbit any minute now. The model they’re built on isn’t going to work going forward, it said.

But fear not. It has the solution.

It’s called the “New Network” and the vision, which called for Juniper to dream up with a new logo, is supposed to reinvent the network and the economics of networking and save the day complements of its new software, silicon, systems and partnerships.

Juniper is, for instance, promising to roll out new line cards and routers that process two to four times more traffic than the competition.

Its soon-to-be new flagship MX960 router, due out in December, is supposed to be able to download the entire contents of the Library of Congress in 12 seconds and access 8.5 million iTunes in a tenth of a second, 50 Blu-Ray DVDs in less than five seconds, 10 years of Hubble Telescope data in a minute and 430,000 HDTV channels simultaneously.

It will be built around a 65nm Junos Trio chipset, part of a new Junos One processor family, that’s supposed to let networks scale dynamically and provide more bandwidth, subscribers and services all at the same time – no compromise, Juniper says.

It also claims breakthroughs in delivering rich business, residential and mobile services at massive scale at half the power per gigabit.

The chipset, code named Trinity, cost $80 million and five years to develop and there are 30 patents pending on the thing.

The purpose-built, industry-first “network instruction set,” built into the silicon, is supposed to combine the performance benefits of ASICs with the flexibility of network processors and yield total router throughput of 2.6 terabits a second and nimbly manage 2.3 million subscribers on a rack.

The glory of widgetry, however, is a technology called 3D Scaling responsible for the breathtaking numbers.

Juniper calls 3D Scaling “one of those rare technology breakthroughs that can change business models” and it intends to use the secret sauce in its switches and security products too.

It claims the widgetry will offer a potential 540% increase in ROI over five years, improve power efficiency by 10 to one over other vendors, and cut aggregation services opex by a possible 47%, business services opex by up to 63%, and residential services by maybe 77%.

Of course what’s a router without software, and the keystone of Juniper’s platform is Junos, its updated open network operating system, Juniper’s answer to Cisco’s Internetwork Operating System (IOS).

The software now also includes Junos Space, available at prices starting at $15,000, and Junos Pulse, coming in the first half of next year.

Space is an open network application development and deployment platform, an SDK and an API meant to be used by third parties although it hasn’t been yet.

Pulse is an integrated multi-service network client that’s supposed to reduce the number of client applications that have to be distributed and supported and provide the location-aware and identity-aware access to networks that are currently available from Juniper in separate network clients.

Space is supposed to simplify network operations, automate support and accelerate service delivery. It ships initially pre-loaded with three Juniper-provided applications: Ethernet Activator, which is supposed to activate services, including VPN services, up to 10 times faster than the competition; Route Analyzer, from Packet Design, a company Juniper put money in a year ago, which is supposed to provide DVR-like recording and playback capability to plan, simulate and troubleshoot MPLS networks; and the very sensible time-saving Service Now, which is supposed resolve service issues by having Juniper systems “call” Juniper support experts with troubleshooting data and details.

And for the cloud people Juniper will have gateways in the first half that reportedly scale to support 10 million concurrent user sessions – 2.5 times more than Juniper’s previous generation and five times more than Cisco.

The company also say the gateways can deliver up to six times faster firewall and seven times faster intrusion prevention services at a 50% power savings and 67% space savings over Cisco for comparable throughput.

It also got a bunch of tools for securing cloud services along with new support for VMware and Citrix.

Apparently Microsoft’s going to be using Juniper’s widgetry in Azure.

IBM, which cut a Cisco-snubbing OEM deal with Juniper in July because of Cisco’s adventure into servers, is going to pick up Juniper’s upcoming gateways in addition to its Ethernet switches and routers and sell them under the IBM label.

IBM and Juniper already have a collaborative single fabric project called Stratus that’s supposed to simplify the cloud infrastructure by reducing components and collapsing tiers, share pools of resources and secure everything – yada yada yada – that they announced in February. No more news on that score.

Dell has also spit in Cisco’s eye and is going to sell Juniper Networks’ widgets direct and indirect under its PowerConnect brand.

The stuff includes Juniper’s MX routers, EX Ethernet switches and SRX gateways, all running Junos, the same stuff as IBM.

Forget that Dell already carries stuff like this from Brocade; that only underscores its message to Cisco.

Dell and Juniper are planning to work together on open, standards-based solutions for virtualized data centers and deliver technology solutions using Converged Enhanced Ethernet (CEE), a k a Data Center Bridging (DCB) and iSCSI to improve network economics. They mean to deliver a secure network infrastructure from a customer’s traditional data center out to its branch offices, remote workers, customers and business partners and provide orchestrated management of users, workloads and data – in the name of avoiding single-vendor lock-in.

Dell also plans to market, service and support Juniper’s high-performance networking solutions.

Meanwhile, Blade Network Technologies has licensed Junos, Juniper’s first licensing deal, to develop blade server switches under an exclusive arrangement that sees it sell them to server makers worldwide.

Blade, a big player in the space, will put its value-added data center features on the switches, such as network-aware VMready virtualization, AMP Active Multi-Pathing technology, HotLinks for high availability as well as offer a vNIC (Virtual Network Interface Card), OFM (Open Fabric Manager) and Advanced OFM.

Juniper also claims to have the first 120 Gbps line card with highest 10GE density for aggregation, video distribution, data center and edge routing; the industry’s only edge routing with line-rate 100GbE performance for edge uplink, inter-data center and high-bandwidth aggregation; the industry’s most powerful 3.5-inch routers (eight times faster than competitors) designed for delivering Carrier Ethernet services for multi-tenant buildings, as well as mobile aggregation, video and enterprise edge deployments; an Active Broadband Networks application in development for monitoring cable bandwidth and improving cable subscriber experiences; an Ankeena Networks application for video streaming and caching to enable low-cost, TV-like viewing; and a coy Project Falcon reference architecture for the mobile space.

Juniper’s Out Gunning for Cisco

Ruminations on Oracle, MySQL & Pandora’s Box

Tilera’s 100 Cores Aimed at Cloud Disruption

Amazon Cuts Prices; Adds Relational Database

Chrome Sued for Patent Infringement

Microsoft Nudges Eclipse Developers to Windows-Ware

Canonical Offers Free Cloudware

Novell Denied Stay in SCO Trial

LA To Go with Google Apps on Condition…

Cisco Buys Cloud-Based Security Company

IBM Fails To Stop its M&A Chief from Working at Dell

Start-up Makes Office Share

Zeus To Manage the Cloud

VMware’s Fusion 3 Stumbles at the Gate

Nimsoft Betas a Rap Sheet on the Cloud

‘Tipper A’ Had Her Fingers in the Intel Cookie Jar Before

Adobe & Salesforce Cut Cloud Deal

Xenocode Virtualized Windows Apps

Microsoft Falls Off Cliff, Keeps on Ticking

‘The Crash is Behind Us’: Peddie

Barron’s Fingers 10 To Go as Acquisitions

IBM’s Wannabe Union Wants All IBM Exec Investigated

Microsoft Open its First Store

Icahn Throws in the Towel

IBM Names 13th Board Member Right Before Halloween

AOL Lining Up Board

Ask.com For Sale

SAP Lowers Projections

Appistry Adds Old Spook to Board in Time for Halloween

Intel CEO Believes Spending Logjam About To Break

IBM Adds $5b to Stock Buy-Back Budget

VMware’s Latest Desktop Virtualization Kit Out

Intel Seeks To Standardize the Microserver: Report

Sun Down $2 Billion; Sun CEO Up $7 Million: AP

Oracle co-president Safra Catz met with the European Commission’s antitrust boss Neelie Kroes to try to negotiate Oracle’s way out from under the EC’s investigation into the anti-competitive issues of Oracle acquiring the European-created open source database MySQL if it takes over Sun.

Apparently she failed.

“Kroes expressed her disappointment that Oracle failed to produce, despite repeated requests, either hard evidence that there were no competition problems or a proposal for a remedy to the competition concerns identified by the commission,” EC spokesman Jonathan Todd said Wednesday according to Bloomberg. “Kroes reiterated to Catz the commission’s willingness to move quickly towards a decision but underlined that a rapid solution lies in Oracle’s hands.”

“Either they have to give us the information to prove that our competition concerns are not well founded or offer remedies to satisfy our concerns. The progress and speed on this case is entirely in the hands of Oracle,” he said.

Sun said Tuesday that it will cut 3,000 jobs over the next 12 months, blaming the decision on the EC’s delay in approving its acquisition by Oracle. Sun is supposed to be losing $100 million a month to uncertainties over its fate.

There had been whispers of a possible interim EC deadline this week. It must have depended on how negotiations between Catz and Kroes went. The EC’s formal deadline for its investigation is January 19. Oracle got US approval in August.

Microsoft, SAP and IBM are all believed to have whispered in the EC’s ear to harry Oracle and now the EC is being lobbied by an informal open source collective including MySQL’s creator to force Oracle to abandon MySQL to another company. Likely favorites include Red Hat, Google and VMware. And naturally Oracle doesn’t want to create another competitor.

There’s another burr under IBM’s mainframe saddle besides the Justice Department’s investigation into its practices with the European Commission passing the DOJ notes – a Neon burr.

Neon Enterprise Software is a Sugar Land, Texas mainframe tools company 100% owned by John Moores, the “M” in BMC, who has reportedly poured a pretty penny into the place. And Neon thinks it can subtract an easy billion dollars a year from IBM’s mainframe revenues. Now IBM CEO Sam Palmisano has been known to say, under other circumstances, that a billion dollars isn’t material to IBM so maybe he won’t miss it.

See, Neon’s got this proprietary software trick called zPrime that lets a mainframe user move a lot of its workloads off the mainframe’s central processor and onto the zIIP and zAAP specialty processors that IBM created to accelerate and run DB2 and Java, which can save the user millions of dollars a year.

Neon claims that the technique is perfectly legal, doesn’t violate IBM IP and meets all the many use restrictions that IBM has ringed its mainframes with.

IBM’s initial reaction to Neon was to write a letter to its mainframe customers over the signature of its zSeries CTO Mark Anzani suggesting that it wasn’t legal. But one school of thought argues that if IBM had a legal leg to stand on it would probably have kicked Neon in the crotch by now.

The letter – which Neon claims kicked off a “massive FUD campaign” by IBM against it – reads in part:

“In general, any product which is designed to cause additional workloads, not designated by IBM or other (software) providers as eligible to run on the Specialty Engines, to nevertheless to be routed to a Specialty Engine should be evaluated to determine whether installation and use of such a product would violate, among other things, the IBM Customer Agreement (for instance, Section 4 regarding authorized use of IBM program products such as z/OS) and/or the license governing use of the IBM ‘Licensed Internal Code’ (frequently referred to as ‘LIC’) running on IBM System z servers, or license agreements with any third-party software providers.

“IBM would also caution its customers regarding any claimed ability to reduce IBM Program license charges by off-loading workloads to Specialty Engines beyond the eligible workload identified by IBM. IBM’s applicable pricing terms governing Eligible Workloads on zIIPs and zAAPs will not apply to zIIPs and zAAPs running anything other than IBM-specified eligible workloads. Therefore, customers should not anticipate any reduction (and may actually experience an increase) in the IBM Program License Charges associated with non-Eligible Workloads which may be off-loaded to IBM Specialty Engines, since the non-Eligible Workload running will cause the software running on the Specialty Engine to be chargeable. IBM cannot comment on the potential impact on the software charges from other third-party software providers.” (See http://blogs.datadirect.com/media/IBM%20position%20document.pdf for the whole letter.)

Now IBM reportedly can’t tell what users are running on their specialty processors, but the monthly bills will be in the mail soon to the 20 mainframe users currently in production with zPrime. They only started getting online in August-September and there’s a two-month lag in billing according to Neon CEO Lacey Edwards, who says there’s 150 companies in a line behind them to evaluate Neon’s widgetry or already doing so.

Since that letter, dated July 10, just a few days after zPrime went live, IBM has taken to refusing to sell mainframe users additional specialty chips if it suspects they’re for running zPrime, Edwards says. IBM doesn’t want to put anything down in writing beyond the letter, he said, but is instead asking the user for a written agreement to a new set of rules, basically a pledge not to use the chips for zPrime.

The move, which seems kind of ill-advised in the middle of an antitrust investigation that might take exception to any hint of tying, is reminiscent of IBM’s refusal to license z/OS for use on Platform Solutions Inc’s Itanium-based machines before it bought PSI, took it off the market and squelched the company’s massive antitrust suit.

PSI’s relatively inexpensive widgetry could run the mainframe operating system as well as Windows, Unix and Linux; and HP wanted to buy it before IBM ran HP off.

Anyway, emboldened by their own lawyers’ opinion that IBM has a contractual obligation to supply additional specialty chips, a handful of mainframe users are starting to push back – Edwards says – and threaten to buy their other gear elsewhere if IBM doesn’t loosen up on the chips – and there are another couple dozen mainframe sites that say they’re also willing to go to the mat with Big Blue – but IBM also has a way of checkmating a lot of protest by going upstairs in these accounts. Edwards, who describes it as “shadow boxing,” is still hoping for mass protest.

After all, zPrime, which took six man/years and two calendar years to develop, is supposed to be able to cut 20% of the mainframe user’s annual hardware and software costs under the conventional use-pricing structures.

Unlike any approach tried to date, it can reportedly put more than half of a z’s workloads on the specialty processors, which have – or at least had – no usage charge and cost way less than the central processors and that includes stuff like IMS, DB2, CICS, TSO/ISPF and batch workloads.

Edwards says that zPrime could also cut the cost of third-party mainframe software, whose pricing model he finds “eerily similar” to IBM’s, by maybe a half-billion bucks a year.

Neon has collected testimonials from early adopters. A credit card companies figures to cut its overall transaction costs by up to 50%.

Another company documented routing 90% of its mainframe Information Management System (IMS) online processing, 44% of its Customer Information Control System (CICS) online processing and 93% of its IMS and DB2 batch processing to zIIPs and reportedly determined it will not only slash its cost of MIPS on the central processors, but avert an impending MIPS use overage and associated cost penalties. And it won’t have to upgrade its mainframe and add two central processing engines this year.

Which explains why IBM’s having agita.

Neon will evaluate the market situation in January. There is of course the ongoing DOJ probe and complaints have been lodged with the EC, which if it launches a formal investigation is expected to be more aggressive than the DOJ. But if Neon finds itself stymied, it’s prepared, Edwards said, to file its own suit against IBM.

Like PSI did and T3 Technologies still does, Neon believes that IBM limits competition and grossly overcharges customers.

Neon figures its sweet spot is anywhere from maybe 2,000-5,000 machines out of a total universe of somewhere between 6,000 and 8,000 companies and 10,000 mainframe sites. Apparently Neon is constantly massaging the data. Its pricing is tailored to each site and depends on variables like the size of the machine and workload but its rock bottom price is $250,000. It will do a cost benefit analysis for interested parties. The company also has a bunch of resellers representing it.

IBM’s Mainframe Monopoly Threatened by BMC Founder’s Shop
Oracle’s Summit with EC Fails
Sun To Cut 3,000 Jobs, Blames EC
Oracle+MySQL Opponents Take to the Barricades
IBM Exec Out on Bail as Galleon Sinks Below the Waves
Start-up Claims Better-than-On-Premises Cloud Storage
The Cloud Has Cross-Border Ambitions
Sidekick Shows Faint Signs of Life
Greenplum Stoops To Conquer
VMware Coming Back Along with the Economy
Citrix Regroups on XenDesktop Licensing
Citrix Product Sales Take a Hit
Voltaire Benefits from Cisco Getting Uppity
Google Goes on Offense against Office
SpringSource Moving to Spring 3.0
Zend Server Gets a Plane-like ‘Black Box’
Google Apps: Not as Cheap as They Look
10th Circuit Hands SCO a Jury Trial
The Pentagigatweet
Risk Capital Still Pretty Chicken
Beta Time in Microsoftville
Visions of Dollar Signs Dance in Oracle’s Head
Microsoft To Data-Mine Facebook & Twitter
Nokia Sues the iPhone
Kindle Helps Launch Windows 7

IBM’s Mainframe Monopoly Threatened by BMC Founder’s Shop

Oracle’s Summit with EC Fails

Sun To Cut 3,000 Jobs, Blames EC

Oracle+MySQL Opponents Take to the Barricades

IBM Exec Out on Bail as Galleon Sinks Below the Waves

Start-up Claims Better-than-On-Premises Cloud Storage

The Cloud Has Cross-Border Ambitions

Sidekick Shows Faint Signs of Life

Greenplum Stoops To Conquer

VMware Coming Back Along with the Economy

Citrix Regroups on XenDesktop Licensing

Citrix Product Sales Take a Hit

Voltaire Benefits from Cisco Getting Uppity

Google Goes on Offense against Office

SpringSource Moving to Spring 3.0

Zend Server Gets a Plane-like ‘Black Box’

Google Apps: Not as Cheap as They Look

10th Circuit Hands SCO a Jury Trial

The Pentagigatweet

Risk Capital Still Pretty Chicken

Beta Time in Microsoftville

Visions of Dollar Signs Dance in Oracle’s Head

Microsoft To Data-Mine Facebook & Twitter

Nokia Sues the iPhone

Kindle Helps Launch Windows 7

Rentokil Initial, an odd combination of a modern-day charwoman who in her off-hours is a courier service, exterminator, insurance adjuster, heating and air conditioning installer and water and electrical tester, has gone with Google Apps, expecting to be the largest deployment of its paid Premier Edition yet.

The cloud widgetry will replace Rentokil’s 180 e-mail domains and 40 mail systems – everything from open source to Microsoft – as it rolls out to 35,000 employees in 50 countries and six operating divisions by the end of next year.

The UK-based conglomerate called it part of a “five year turnaround plan to enhance capability and introduce operational excellence” ands said the decision was less about saving money than “creating capability.”

The widgetry will go to 20,000 desk-bound PC users and 15,000 mobile folk who currently don’t have a company e-mail address. They are expected to use PDAs, home computers or shared PCs at their branch office.

The company also expects to use Google’s integrated chat and video features to support training and improve productivity and collaboration within and between divisions and functions. And it’s got a real use for Google’s automatic e-mail translation and the real-time translation in Google Talk.

Rentokil ran a 100-day pilot at its Ambius office plants division that involved 800 users in global locations.

Google Apps includes Gmail, Google Calendar, Talk, Docs and Sites. The Premier Edition, which includes 25GB of e-mail storage, usually runs $50 (40 euros or 33 pounds) a year per head. Terms were not disclosed.

Iron Mountain: A Rock Slide on Rival Cloud Storage?

Iron Mountain – where companies have been storing their IP and data for a couple of generations now – has opened its Archive Services Platform so developers and ISVs can offer its cloud storage with their applications.

The great $3 billion-a-year pack rat has never extended its platform to outside application developers before.

Besides long-term data storage for data-intensive apps, Iron Mountain is also offering use of its own advanced indexing, full-text search, retrieval, metadata support, retention and destruction.

The company claims to be more practiced at this cloud stuff than other people. It’s been providing cloud storage solutions since 1995 when it brought out Connected Backup for PC and started using the Internet to provide secure backup for companies’ and individuals’ PC data.

It subsequently developed a Storage-as-a-Service suite of solutions for everything from secure e-mail to file and image archiving, online backup and recovery and software escrow.

Founded in 1951, Iron Mountain has 140,000 corporate clients worldwide and can argue security and reliability. On the face of its reputation it should pose a very serious competitor to the other cloud storage wannabes.

Taneja Group director of validation services Jeff Boles said, “The cloud is bursting with companies eager to deliver storage services to business customers. Success will require a lot more than a simple API and a bucket of storage on the remote end of a wire.”

Iron Mountain has set up a developer program to provide third parties with the tools to integrate with its enterprise-class cloud archiving services either by coding to a Web Services API or through a set of command-line tools.

Besides the SOAP and REST Web Services interfaces, the platform uses standard NFS and CIFS interfaces and offers petabyte scalability.

Data is stored using 256 AES encryption technology and the platform is WORM-enabled when retention is applied.

Data is stored redundantly within and across geographically split data centers, in other words, four times across two data centers.

Stored data is full-text indexed when it comes in and can be searched by ID, content and metadata. The platform computes SHA-256 hashes of the data and check hashes for discrepancies on each and every step of storage and retrieval to guarantee data integrity.

Iron Mountain employs both Secure Socket Layer (SSL) and Transport Socket Layer (TSL) security and certificates, good for a year, instead of just user IDs and passwords in transmitting digital assets to and from its data centers. Each transaction includes bilateral authentication.

The company’s also got a lot of physical security: underground sites, real-time closed circuit TV monitoring, a commercial-level power grid with generator backup, on-site firefighting apparatus and personnel, and multi-tiered access controls. Only authorized personnel with biometric passes are reportedly allowed in specific areas.

The company’s vague on the actual numbers but says that users are charged a monthly per/GB storage fee and “there are no hidden charges for transmitting or retrieving data.” Developers will be sent a bill itemizing each customer’s storage use every month.

They can also use a co-branding “Protected by Iron Mountain” logo.

Darl McBride, the CEO of SCO and the industry’s favorite pariah, expects to get fired any minute now.

He expects to get fired because he’s adamantly opposed to winding SCO down, laying off its people and settling the company’s litigation against Novell and IBM for chump change, which is the way he sees things going if the Chapter 11 trustee put in charge of SCO keeps going down the path he appears to be going down – despite the fact that the trustee told McBride when he got there that he thinks there is “significant value in the litigation.”

What’s got McBride’s hackles up is that after the favorable 10th Circuit ruling overturning the summary judgment that Novell owns Unix McBride brought a major Wall Street investor new to the scene to the table, complete with term sheet, to invest up to $25 million in SCO, keep it functioning and let it get to the jury trial it’s been hankering after all these years.

The only problem is this opportunity fell on deaf ears. Not so much as a return phone call to the would-be investor from the trustee, McBride says.

So here’s what’s gonna happen.

If McBride gets fired and the trustee comes through with a reasonable settlement all well and good, he said. IBM can have the company and declare victory. However, if the best the trustee can do is a quick settlement in the range of tens of millions, then the shareholders will revolt and McBride is prepared to lead them to the bankruptcy court in Delaware and plead for the opportunity for their case to be heard by a jury in the district court in Utah where the Novell case is currently headed anyway.

Mock trials – whether done by SCO or reportedly by IBM and Novell – all indicate SCO would win and be declared the owner of Unix, reopening the IBM case and the charge that Big Blue ripped off SCO’s IP and stuck it in Linux and reopening the SCOsource tax on Linux. The third-party calculations of the damages SCO suffered all reportedly put the number somewhere between $2.5 billion and $7 billion.

That’s why serious people with serious money and equally serious lawyers of their own who look at the case are reportedly willing to underwrite SCO and roll the dice.

McBride is figuring on coming up with a counter-proposal to lay before the bankruptcy judge to get SCO its day in court and keep the shareholders’ right intact.

What If Darl McBride Gets Fired?
Google Apps Lands its Biggest Fish Yet
Microsoft Finds Lost Sidekick Data
AMD Fools the Pundits, While Google & IBM Pull Their Weight
Acer Trashes Dell
Dell To Peddle Salesforce.com’s Widgetry
Now That’s What I Call Venture Capital
Google Shucks its Interlocking Directorate
Avaya Uses Xen for Unified Communications
Cisco Buys Starent Networks
Jahia Promises Not To Compete with the Channel
Alfresco Gets Hunting License
Heroku Recruits New CEO
Nokia Unwraps its First Netbook
Rackspace Runs Oracle
NComputing Unveils the First USB-Connected Virtual Desktop Client
Kaavo Moves On to Rackspace Cloud
NetSuite Piggybacks on Oracle
EC Helps DOJ Investigate IBM
Perot Buys BearingPoint China
Ellison Puts $10 Million Where His Mouth Is
Omniture Rewarded Execs Right Before Adobe Deal
SAP’s Novell’s New BFF
Dell’s Planning More Acquisitions
IDC Ups Cloud Forecast
Believe It or Not, New Sparc Chips
Bing Treading Water
SAP May Abandon Separate Maintenance Fees
It’s Not a Good Time for Clouds
Bloomberg Buys BusinessWeek

Having just gone into competition with Google’s Gmail Monday, IBM said Tuesday that it’s going to take on Amazon’s S3 storage cloud and anybody else in the storage cloud business by launching its own Smart Business Storage Cloud along with a so-called Information Archive.

As with its day-old iNotes e-mail solution, which also targets Microsoft, IBM is sticking to its knitting. It’s not trolling for the great unwashed with this particular venture. It wants business for a customer.

However, this private storage cloud is only the first of the cloud-based storage and analytics solutions IBM has up its sleeve.

It’s also promising – and this is where Amazon has to sit up and pay attention – a business-grade public storage cloud that will be offered with flexible consumption models and a self-service user interface to fully abstract the technology from the end user.

Sounds pretty much like S3.

Anyway, IBM figures people are interested in storage clouds because of their low price points but it dismisses what’s out there as “sandboxes” used for secondary or tertiary copies of data, or for development and test environments where data isn’t accessed that often and isn’t large-scale.

IBM’s Smart Business Storage Cloud is supposed to change all that.

The widgetry is configured out of low-cost components in what IBM says is a “true scale-out clustered model not offered by its competition.”

And like iNotes it can be implemented either on the client’s premises or as part of an outsourcing arrangement.

It’ll support multiple petabytes of capacity, billions of files, and scale-out performance that IBM says has been limited up till now to the largest HPC systems.

It’s also supposed to be fully compliant with the file access methods available on all major platforms “for seamless transition to a cloud storage implementation.”

IBM says its General Parallel File System has been combined with storage and server technologies like XIV and BladeCenter to house billions of files under one globally addressable namespace.

It claims the solution is highly secure and built to make use of a client’s existing security and authentication infrastructure.

IBM will also offer services to help with implementation and an optional ongoing lightweight managed service to help clients manage their cloud environment on an ongoing basis.

IBM claims to be sensitive to user concerns of vendor lock-in with cloud solutions, “especially for data storage where migration costs into and out of the cloud can be costly” and says it will support standard file access protocols so moving data into and out of its storage cloud is “as simple as a file copy operation.”

It didn’t say what it would cost.

For clients looking for a single unified platform for information retention, IBM’s got an Information Archive that it says realizes a key promise of cloud computing: seamless access to information, including archived data, no matter where it is.

The Information Archive is an integrated hardware and software solution that’s supposed to answer a company’s complete data retention needs, including business, legal and regulatory, by leveraging different tiers of storage, including disk and tape, with policy-based management that automatically moves less active information to more cost-effective storage systems.

IBM says the widgetry uses a customizable “collections-based” approach so the archived data can be accessed in a private cloud environment, even if it’s stored on tape media. It claims this capability is critical given the increasing amount of data that’s expected to exist in archived formats.

IBM has also added three new cloud consulting offerings to its portfolio for clients who want an end-to-end cloud business-based IT strategy or help in selecting the right cloud delivery model.

© 2012 LinuxGram Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha