Dell, the industry’s bellwether of pain, saw earnings plunge 63% to $290 million or 15cents a share on revenues down 23% to $12.3 billion in its first fiscal quarter ended May 1.

Its operating income was off 54% at $414 million. Restructuring cost it nine cents a share or $185 million. Without that charge, Dell earnings would have been 24 cents, a penny better than where the Wall Street models had it but compared to those models revenue was light. It was supposed to be close to $12.7 billion.

Claiming to be able to see demand signals earlier than other companies, Dell CFO Brian Gladden said on the conference call, “I don’t believe there is enough momentum to call a bottom yet.”

On the other hand he doesn’t expect a return to the nadir of February and early March.

However, the company offered no formal guidance, only touchy-feely stuff.

It said in its press release that “Indicators of global IT demand remain mixed, and the broader environment is still challenging. The company is positioning itself for improvement in IT spending by focusing on customer requirements and their experience with Dell, along with internal operating efficiency and costs.”

In a statement a more optimistic Michael Dell added, “Signals about the demand environment are mixed, but we’re preparing for what we believe will be a powerful replacement cycle, with virtualization and managed services playing larger roles in what customers want and Dell provides.”

However, on the conference call Gladden and Dell said that most macro indicators are negative and are most pronounced in the large commercial sector Dell depends on.

They expect most commercial customers to continue to defer spending until the macro economy brightens up and for business from them to be seasonally slow between now and October. They expect “reasonable” performance out of federal, consumer and education.

In the quarter Dell’s operating expenses were down $101 million sequentially and $312 million year-over-year. It said it’s on track to realize $4 billion in annualized cost reductions but it’s otherwise hard to pin down on that subject.

Dell congratulated itself on the operating efficiency and cost management that produced $761 million in cash flow from operations; Dell now has $10.7 billion in the bank. Gladden said the company is “protecting our liquidity for organic and non-organic opportunities.”

Dell has reorganized its reporting structure by accounts.

Large enterprise revenue totaled $3.4 billion, down 31%. Units were down 36% year-over-year and down 11% sequentially. Operating income in the segment was $192 million. Happily, revenue from Dell’s EqualLogic virtualized storage acquisition was up 71%. Otherwise storage was down 17%.

Public revenue was $3.2 billion, down 11%. Units were down 14% year-over-year, and flat sequentially. Operating income was $293 million. Dell said growth in its larger government accounts was partially offset weaker demand in other parts of the business which also covers healthcare and education.

Sales to SMBs dropped 30% to $3 billion. Units were down 30% year-over-year, 4% sequentially. Operating income was $230 million.

Michael remarked that a “series of acquisitions has been integrated into cloud-based services for monitoring and managing IT networks for larger customers, which are now being extended to small and medium businesses, first in the US.”

Consumer revenue was down 16% to $2.8 billion with a breakeven operating income. Shipments fell 12%. Notebooks were up 32%, desktops down 20%. The company is targeting a 1%-2% operating margin for this fiscal year. Dell is now represented in 30,000 consumer retail outlets worldwide.

Overall, mobility units fell 5% with revenues down 20%, desktops units were down 26% with revenues down 34%. Server revenues were down 25% with a 28% drop in units. Enhanced services revenue declined 8% to $1.2 billion though deferred revenue was up 4% to $5.6 billion. Software and peripheral revenues dropped 18%.

Dell’s revenue from the BRIC countries dropped 21% year-over-year but increased 11% sequentially. India was slow but China showed some signs of recovery, it said. Revenues from outside the US now represent 48% of the company’s total take.

Its gross margin in fiscal Q1 was 18.1%.

Amazon has started telling people to send in their cloud data by mail.

No, really. Swear to God. It’s not just us enamored of how much better people look by candlelight.

Because of dead-slow bandwidth on burgeoning datasets at the customer end Amazon Web Services (AWS) has invented a new Import/Export service that it started testing the other day in the US.

The limited beta offers to accelerate moving large amounts into S3 using portable storage devices sent back and forth by post.

Amazon gets it and uploads it, bypassing the Internet using its high-speed internal network and vetted personnel.

It intends to add an export facility and then move on to Europe.

It claims it could be more cost-effective than the user upgrading his connectivity because “It is now relatively easy to create a collection of data so large that it cannot be uploaded to offsite storage (e.g., Amazon S3) in a reasonable amount of time,” it says, particularly in the scientific space.

Amazon figures the service can be used for data migration, offsite backup, disaster recovery and direct data interchange – in other words if you regularly get content on portable storage devices from your business associates, they might as well sent it directly to Amazon.

Pricing includes an $80 fee for each storage device plus $2.49-an-hour for the time it takes to upload the data, with partial hours being billed as full hours.

Amazon says that if you’ve got a T1 line and 1TB of data you’d better use the mail otherwise it’ll take you 82 days to upload it. On a T3 connection it’d take three days. It figures the breakeven point would be 100GB and 600GB, respectively. If you’ve got a 100 Mbps connection, it suggests it would be more economical to use the Import/Export service if you’ve got 5TB. If you’re got a 1,000 Mbps connection then your breakeven would appear to be 60TB

Amazon’s very favorite device has an eSATA interface. USB2’s okay but either’s got to use the FAT32, ext2, ext3 or NTFS file system and fir an 8U rack. Otherwise you’ve got to negotiate with them. Amazon says it’ll return the device.

Cloud by Mail
Desktone Trademarks DaaS
Google’s Out To Catch a Wave
Red Hat Sues Swiss Government Agency over Microsoft Deal
Dell’s Not Ready To Call a Bottom
IBM Sues its Ex-M&A Chief for Taking a Job at Dell
Adobe Treads on PowerPoint’s Toes
Microsoft Abandons its Search Engine for a ‘Decision’ Engine
HP Only Gets a Piece of Donatelli
VMware Buys 5% of Terremark
Intel Indulges in RISCy Saber Rattling
It Can’t Get Much Worst for Servers than Q1: IDC
‘The Bad News is We’re Gaining Share’: HP CEO Mark Hurd
Novell Profits Up & It’s Got a New Friend
HP Using Cast Iron To Push Clouds through the Channel
AOL To Spin Out of Time Warner
EMC Buys Configuresoft
Russians Value Facebook at $10b, Chuck in $200m
Nvidia’s Ion Gets its First Customer
Netbooks Cannibalize 20% of Laptops
Ex-MySQL Chief Joins RightScale Board

Talend, the open source company with the data integration software, is moving up-market with a new enterprise-grade Integration Suite MPx that won’t be open sourced.

The massively parallelized widgetry will pit Talend against the ultra-secretive ETL house Ab Initio, which is notorious for not letting its software be seen by anyone other than NDA-sworn users, refusing interviews with Gartner and not returning phone calls.

The ploy appears to be part feminine mystique, part pure paranoia.

Ab Initio was started maybe 14 years ago by Sheryl Handler, a eccentric woman who studied interior design, has a master’s in landscape architecture from Harvard, and wound up CEO of Thinking Machines, the seminal-but-doomed massively parallel supercomputer house and DARPA pet whose black Connection Machine made a cameo appearance in the movie Jurassic Park.

Anyway, Talend VP of marketing Yves de Montcheuil thinks that despite Ab Initio’s cloak of secrecy Integration Suite MPx’s FileScale technology and massively parallelized processes will match its rival’s reportedly chi-chi skills with huge amounts of data.

Talend reckons Integration Suite MPx can “shatter the limits typically associated with traditional data integration processes.”

It’s had mathematicians at the École Polytechnique, the great French engineering school, working on the MPx’s underlying algorithms; MPx’s development took 18 months.

The FileScale technology that MPx introduces to Talend’s Integration Suite was inspired but not copied from Google’s MapReduce architecture for highly distributed processing of data in a data set mode.

It lets integration processes sort, filter and merge data, do aggregation and arithmetic functions and transform and ensure the compliance of data.

Talend says FileScale components are optimized for each supported platform for the highest possible performance. Those platforms include 32- and 64-bit Windows and Linux, Solaris and OpenSolaris, both Sparc and Intel, AIX and HP-UX.

The widgetry also has multiple levels of massive parallelization that can execute separate sub-processes in parallel, break down data sets into many parallel streams and leverage parallel database loaders.

Talend is promising to process great big volumes of data very quickly to draw nearer to real-time meaning from it. It says data warehouses and analytic applications can be refreshed more often and include more granular data for more accurate analysis.

Talend ran a benchmark on a Sun Blade X6270 server fitted with two quad-core 2.2GHz Xeons and 24GB of RAM running Solaris 10 Update 6, and claims to have reached levels of scalability in sorting and calculation tests that have never been met before.

Of course there are no public benchmarks of Ab Initio but Talend says its benchmark was done with industry-standard TPC-H data sets ranging from six million to 3.3 billion records and its in-memory sorting reached up to a million records a second with linear scalability and record-breaking sorting on the really big data sets of 200,000-400,000 records a second with an average of 220,000 records a second.

Talend’s pricing depends on how many developers are using the stuff, starting at about $100,000. Ab Initio reportedly costs about $500,000 on average and may run into the millions. It is also supposed to eat up hardware resources. Both pieces of software heavily target financial houses and the telecom industry to streamline operations such as invoice generation.

Talend is backed by AGF Private Equity and Balderton Capital, an early investor in MySQL whose general partner Bernard Liautaud started and ran Business Objects until it was sold to SAP for $6.7 billion. Liautaud is now on Talend’s board.

Cisco has finally bowed to the demands of the Free Software Foundation (FSF) and resolved that suit for copyright infringement that FSF filed in December over Cisco playing fast and loose with its GPL- and LGPL-protected code.

Cisco will pay FSF an unspecified amount for its sins and FSF will drop its suit, the first one it ever filed. For the last 15 years its enforcers have been able to persuade erring companies to come into line without going to court.

Cisco proved more obdurant.

See, FSF wanted Cisco to make all the license-protected Cisco-modified source code used in the firmware in its Linux-based Linksys routers generally available and Cisco didn’t want to.

It felt what FSF called incomplete and outdated code made it “substantially in compliance.”

Since Cisco hasn’t been compliant since 2003 and since Linksys is a very popular gadget and since a dozen or so Linksys products as well as Cisco’s Quick-VPN router software were involved and since Cisco resisted FSF’s demands, the penalty it’s paying could be tidy.

The suit had demanded the profits Cisco made off the Linksys widgetry and damages on top of that for treading on the FSF-copyrighted GNU C Library (GLibC), GNU Coreutils, GNU Readline, GNU Parted, GNU Wget (WGet), GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), GNU Binutils and GNU Debugger (GDB), all stuff central to the Linux operating system.

The widgetry at issue embraced Linksys storage, telephone gateways, wireless routers, wireless media adapters, wireless modems and wireless phone.

As is usual in such cases, Cisco is going to appoint a “free software director” for its Linksys router subsidiary to see it complies with the licenses in the future. This watchdog will report back to FSF.

Cisco has also agreed to “take certain steps” to notify Linksys users of their rights under the GPL and other applicable licenses, publish a licensing notice on the Linksys web site, provide additional notices in a separate publication and make the complete source code for FSF programs used available on its web site.

Talend To Compete Against a Cipher
FSF Finally Wrestles Cisco into Compliance
Intel Chip Reportedly Delayed on Account of IBM/Oracle/Sun
Netbooks: Take Two
VMware’s Cloud Widgetry Arrives
Big Blue’s in the Black Box Game
You Suppose Microsoft’s Spider Will Have Any Sting?
Microsoft & Linux Foundation Send Joint Letter of Protest
AT&T & EMC Pair on Cloud Storage
HP To Can Another 6,400 People
Sun To Open Java Store
Pegasystems Joins the Cloud Camp
Dell To Build Servers Out of Laptop Chips
EC2 Getting New Features
Lenovo’s Q4 Results Stink
3Tera To Bait Cloud Adopters with AppStore
Gmail Now Translates
Dell Pushes Netbook for Kids
Canonical Lassos S3 for Live Mesh Knock-Off
Black Duck & Microsoft Cut Deal
Canonical Manages Ubuntu on EC2
IBM Survey Claims Linux Desktops Easier to Deploy Than Expected
IBM: Antitrust Target
Apple Not-a-Netbook Predicted
Big Losers
Acer Reportedly Cuts Netbook Orders
Fujitsu Reportedly Thinking Acquisitions
Intel To Unwrap Eight-Core Nehalem
Wal-Mart Wants To Replace Circuit City
Greylock Takes Horace Greeley’s Advice: Goes West
Rackspace Email Upgraded
HP Recalls Batteries
Alleged Infringement To Cost Microsoft $200m
Five-Dimensional DVDs

Oracle said Wednesday that it’s buying Virtual Iron (VI), the Linux/Xen-based virtualization house that’s probably fourth in the queue after VMware, Microsoft and Citrix and maybe ahead of Red Hat and Novell.

The prospective purchase is a bit odd because Oracle already has its own Xen-based virtualization and is about to get a whole lot more of it when it takes over Sun, including Sun’s xVM Ops Center.

But apparently it wants VI’s management skills. And it wants to bedevil the virtualization leadership, or at least keep them out of its patch.

Oracle says it means to combine Virtual Iron’s widgetry with its own VM product expecting to get “more comprehensive and dynamic resource management across the full software stack” out of it.

That’s supposed to give users better capacity utilization, streamlined virtual server configuration and improved visibility and control of their enterprise software.

The odd bit there is that Virtual Iron’s been focused on SMBs; so does that mean Oracle’s going down-market? It wasn’t clear.

Oracle says it will produce a single integrated virtualization management solution for both physical and virtual environments.

It said the combination of Virtual Iron technology with its Enterprise Manager should make for more agility in meeting application service levels for virtual environments.

VI will also give Oracle the automation to reduce server power consumption and an open API.

Oracle didn’t say how much it’s paying for the joint but Virtual Iron raised $65 million in venture capital from folks like Intel, Goldman Sachs, Highland Capital and Matrix Partners.

The acquisition, an open secret for the last month or so, is supposed to close this summer. Oracle says it’s keeping VI staff and reviewing the existing VI product roadmap. It’s telling VI customers it’ll get back to them about directions.

So Oracle Thinks It’s Buying MySQL Huh
Google Crashes
No Such Thing as Too Much Virtualization at Oracle
We Didn’t Do It: Otellini
Peeking through the Keyhole on Sun’s Boardroom
AMD Gains Market Share at Intel’s Expense: IDC
SGI Defies Death – Again
Microsoft’s Bringing Holy Water to its EC Hearing
It’s Official. Windows 7 Here for the Holidays
Microsoft in a First Sells Billions in Bonds
Sun May Have Bribed Somebody
Oracle + Sun Will Be Like the iPhone: Ellison
IBM & Novell Press for SCO’s Death
Linux: The Cloud Mother
New Linux.com Goes Live
Q2 Demand Better-than-Expected: Intel
Sun: Where the Prospect of Unemployment Can Be Positively Appetizing
Feds Go Cloud Shopping
Well, Being a Plumber is More Essential Work
Salesforce Claims Edge on Java & .NET
Intel To Put $12m into Visual Computing Center
VKernel Gets $7m B Round
Sparc Prototype World’s Fastest Chip
SAP Calls a Bottom
AMD GPU Breaks 1GHz Barrier
The Panic is Over: WSJ

Larry Ellison has bought himself a revolt.

MySQL refuses to go gentle into Oracle’s uncertain arms.

Monty Widenius, principal author of the original version of the open source database and a founder of the MySQL company that Sun bought last year for a billion dollars, is proposing to wrest control of the widgetry from Oracle.

He has kicked off a “vendor-neutral” consortium called the Open Database Alliance that he envisions being the hub of MySQL development, binaries, derivative code, tools, enhancements as well as training and support provided by a collection of open source companies like Percona, a MySQL services and support firm and co-founder of the consortium.

He has sucked out of Sun all but three of the key MySQL developers who, he says, “understand the whole system,” for his own start-up Monty Program Ab and expects the missing three to join him soon too. He claims their familiarity with the database is irreplaceable.

The rebel group will focus on an enterprise-grade MySQL fork called MariaDB that Widenius prefers to call a branch because it will keep in synch with the official MySQL but add more features. A true fork, he explained, and there are lots of other MySQL forks, would push MySQL is a different direction. If the community rallies around MariaDB, he said, it will head off further MySQL fragmentation.

Widenius sees the effort being like what Fedora is to Red Hat and Oracle as just MySQL’s commercial arm. He claims the MySQL market, both developers and users, even its larger users, don’t trust Oracle.

He says he talked to Oracle and initially offered to help it keep the MySQL’s key people and was blown off. He says Oracle said it didn’t know what it was going to do with MySQL, an open source rival to Oracle’s own database.

Widenius sees himself as defending and protecting the MySQL community, and ensuring MySQL’s future against defections to other open source databases like Postgres.

Widenius is an open source purist and the Open Database Alliance will reflect that philosophy. Everybody will contribute and those that can’t do development will still help shape the specifications and pay for the work. Those that join now will shape its structure.

On his blog, Widenius describes the Alliance as initially being a “thin umbrella” but he expects to hire people to help work out the rules and provide marketing for members.

It is effectively the vision Widenius and David Axmark had when they started MySQL. They planned to create a partner network with MySQL AB, a small technical company, at the center with a lot of partners around it facing the large customers.

He sees this structure as being more agile and responsive than a single big company, even the company that MySQL AB became before its acquisition. And his anti-development experience at Sun, on which he had pinned great hopes, clinched that attitude. In his mind it let a defective 5.1 rev of MySQL get out.

He also says that he’s been contacted by many would-be entrepreneurs looking to set up new businesses to exploit opportunities in the MariaDB/MySQL market. He says they should reach out to his investment company Open Ocean for advice and possible funding.

A month or so ago Patrick Galbraith, a former MySQL senior developer, wondered on his blog “What is the official tree? The project lead is Monty, and if he is now saying MariaDB is the official tree. Does that mean that the tree at Sun is now dead? Open source projects usually have their souls found in whoever personally leads the project, not in who owns the copyright of the name. Monty and Brian certainly are open source leaders, so my inclination is to follow them. This is not a slight to MySQL/Sun either, but a question that me as a both a user and developer of MySQL, as well as a former employee and team member of the MySQL development team.”

See opendatabasealliance.com/ and www.openoceancapital.com/.

Voltaire, an InfiniBand loyalist through thick and thin – mostly thin for the last 10 years – has decided it’s long past time to stop beating its head against the wall and expand into Ethernet especially now that InfiniBand and Ethernet are starting to resemble each other and it can bring something to the party.

What it’s bringing is a scale-out Ethernet architecture – based on the next-generation Converged Enhanced Ethernet (CEE) technology that leverages characteristics inherent in InfiniBand – like a lossless fabric, cut-through switching and I/O virtualization – supporting what Voltaire likes to think of as “virtual mainframes” built out of industry-standard elements that make extensive use of virtualization (in other words, “the cloud”).

Actually Voltaire thinks Ethernet “stole” specs from InfiniBand but that’s another story. The so-called CEE standard hasn’t been etched in stone yet but Voltaire’s pretty sure where it’s going to wind up later this year. It can always reprogram if things change.

Anyway, it says its new widgetry, under development for more than 18 months, will improve the user experience and the economics of data center networking. It will also give Voltaire a less fussy crowd of potential users with less rigid performance requirements to cultivate than it’s had with InfiniBand.

Its new fabric is supposed to be a linearly scalable, low-latency, virtualized 10 gigE fabric with lower overall fabric costs and power consumption, greater efficiencies and simplified management even with thousands of nodes.

Voltaire’s approach flattens the expensive hierarchical switching tiers of a Cisco-based configuration that it calls “outdated,” “lacking in innovation” and a pathway to vendor lock-in.

The company claims that a customer building a 1,000-node data center with its magic can get 10x less latency and 4x faster core performance using 3x less switch power consumption for half the price of “alternatives.”

Voltaire says that means saving millions of the dollars.

And for good measure Voltaire says what it’s offering is an open standards architecture as opposed to what it calls Cisco’s Nexus lock-in, which “turns a data center into a Cisco appliance.”

Much of Voltaire’s rhetoric and positioning is now anti-Cisco and Cisco’s entrance into the server market has reportedly prodded Cisco’s competitors IBM and HP to cozy up to Voltaire, setting in train a fight between a standards-based solution and a proprietary one.

Voltaire got Merrill Lynch Research, now a Bank of America property, to opine that “Voltaire will likely be the first company in the market with a working Ethernet-based scalable solution. The company could utilize its vast experience in building grids or fabrics of servers, gained via years of building InfiniBand networks and we believe it may be the only company to have a truly scalable solution already in 2009 – far exceeding Cisco’s specs.”

Voltaire’s mojo is called a natural extension to its 20 Gb/s and 40 Gb/s InfiniBand switches and software and lets users choose their underlying data center fabric.

For its scale-out data center architecture Voltaire has built new high-density Layer 2 core switches that can be clustered to form large, linearly scaling Layer 2 fabrics. But one fabric can reportedly run LAN, IPS and storage traffic simultaneously with guaranteed service attributes and dynamic congestion management.

Its scheme puts L3-L7 switching and services at the edge on the theory that load balancing, say, isn’t needed on every switch.

So imagine L2 data center core switching as high-density, supporting many more nodes in a smaller footprint at a reduced budget; that allows large-scale L2 networks with a high bisectional Multipath bandwidth; that’s virtualization-aware, applying policies to VMs; and that’s multi-class, both lossless and lossy, enabling storage and IPC (lossless) with traditional LAN (lossy) while mitigating the congestion of lossless networks.

There’s also sine-qua-non fabric management software that controls all the physical and virtual switches and I/O devices in the fabric and does fabric monitoring and service-oriented policy enforcement.

Voltaire is not of course abandoning its InfiniBand heritage; it simply wants to see InfiniBand finally deliver on its original promise of being mainstream.

Last year the company’s revenues were up 16% to all of $62 million and it ended Q4 with $55 million in the bank but since going public in July of 2007 it’s only seen four profitable quarters. It wants that to change.

That’s why future software products have been designed to work on both InfiniBand and Ethernet.

The new chips are due later this year, when pricing will be available.

© 2012 LinuxGram Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha