Open Invention Network (OIN), the Linux-protecting patent-collecting consortium put in train by IBM and supported by NEC, Novell, Philips, Red Hat and Sony in the name of mutual deterrence, is whistling up the Penguinista brigade asking them to throw prior art at three Microsoft patents in order to knock them down.

Microsoft claimed the GPL 2-covered Linux kernel treads on three of its file management system patents when it sued TomTom, the Dutch GPS device maker, for patent infringement earlier this year.

A few weeks later – and despite a feeble countersuit and bold public statements – TomTom bent to Microsoft’s will and agreed to pay Microsoft an unspecified amount of money for five years’ worth of patent protection.

Microsoft claimed that the GPL-forbidden payment was constructed in such a way as to leave TomTom “fully compliant with TomTom’s obligation under the General Public License Version 2.”

It did not explain how.

The Penginistas obviously can’t let such a claim stand unchallenged since it opens the door for Microsoft to collect royalties on the Linux kernel more broadly.

So OIN has posted the three US patents – Nos. 5579517, 5758352 and 6256642 – on the Post-Issue Peer-to-Patent web site associated with its Linux Defenders portal for Penguinista quality review.

Meanwhile, Red Hat’s legal department put out a statement meant to get the Penguinistas’ blood boiling in case Microsoft doesn’t do what Red Hat really wants it to do and that’s to foreswear asserting its three patents against Linux.

Red Hat of course could be in real legal and financial jeopardy if Microsoft ever decided to pull the patent trigger.

So in between calling Microsoft names and threatening it with “counterattack,” Red Hat “challenged” Microsoft’s deputy general counsel Horacio Gutierrez to “publicly promise that the patents asserted in TomTom that are being addressed by OIN will not be used by Microsoft for patent aggression against Linux.”

Of course both Red Hat and its little friend OIN could be deceiving themselves about the vulnerability of Microsoft’s patents. Red Hat’s statement cites “numerous public reports” suggesting weaknesses in these patents. However, both ’517 and ’352 have already withstood re-examination by the Patent and Trademark Office. Both were issued in 1996 and reconfirmed 10 years later.

Anyway, OIN said prior art submissions could be made at www.post-issue.org.

The full text of Red Hat’s statement is at http://press.redhat.com/2009/04/28/some-sunshine-on-shadowy-patent-threats-a-reaction-to-microsoft-v-tomtom.

Penguinistas Asked To Invalidate Microsoft Patents
Eucalyptus Goes Commercial
Opscode Raises First Round
Android Netbook Spotted
New HP Biz Laptops Include Linux
Likewise Closes C Round
SCO Appeal Hearing Imminent
Jigsaw Pioneers Data-as-a-Service
EMC Sues To Stop its Ex-Storage Boss from Going to HP
Another $75m Poured into SaaS Start-Up
To Spite Cisco, IBM Cuddles with Brocade
Windows 7 To Virtualize XP
IBM Fields Enterprise Cloud Appliance
Microsoft Cuts $3b Cloud Deal with EDS
DMTF To Develop Cloud Computing Standards
HP Integrates with Microsoft System Center
Fujitsu Building Giant Cloud
Sun Sales Down 20%
Citrix Income Down 80%
Amazon Offers Schools Free Use of Cloud
SAP Complains It’s Like WWII
Door to Google’s Forbidden Zone Opens Briefly
Google Gets Floating Data Center Patent
Windows 7 Reportedly Due October 23
Oracle Sued for Infringement
IBM Ups Dividend; Makes Acquisition Noises
Schmidt & Mundie Named to White House Council
Microsoft Answers EC’s Latest Antitrust Charges
Just Make Out Those Stimulus Checks to I-B-M
Papermaster Back in the Game
Kumo Countdown
Akamai Who?
HP Building $100m Data Center
Active Endpoints Gets $5m in Funding
Atom Hits the Server Circuit
Spring Blossoms Perhaps

VMware Tuesday announced what it calls the industry’s first cloud operating system ahead of delivering the thing sometime before the end of June.

Branded vSphere 4, the expected widgetry, which promises a 100% virtualized cloud, is meant to reinforce VMware’s virtualization leadership and push it out further ahead of Microsoft, which is nipping at its heels.

VMware has, for instance, segmented the stuff so that the low end is now priced considerably lower than its current generation to attract SMBs lest Microsoft pick them off with its “freeware.”

Meanwhile vSphere’s feature-packed upper end will court the enterprise and the hosting service providers.

vSphere is the basis of what VMware calls a private cloud defined not just as an internal cloud but rather as an internal cloud federated with an external cloud or clouds for added capacity.

The company’s pro-cloud argument is that the way things are 70% of IT budgets are spent just keeping the lights on, with 42% going to infrastructure maintenance and another 30% to application maintenance. It claims vSphere can up the percentage available for innovation and competitive advantage.

It says vSphere can cut capital and operational costs by over 50% for all applications. It also claims its management capabilities can save six month’s worth of an administrator’s time running an environment of 100 virtualized hosts.

To make its point about cloud economy VMware says that if its installed base went over to vSphere what it would save on power in a year would be equal to all the power Denmark consumes in 10 days.

vSphere is supposed cut IT costs over and above what was possible with VMware’s current Infrastructure 3 flagship. The company describes the different in saving between generations as “transformative.”

It says to figure about a 30% increase in consolidation ratios, cutting infrastructure costs per application; up to a 50% savings on storage; and a 20% savings kicker on power and cooling.

VMware says vSphere, which will replace Infrastructure 3, takes charge of the whole data center, aggregating and managing large pools of infrastructure – processors, storage and networking – as a seamless dynamic operating environment.

It says it doesn’t matter what the gear is so long as it’s x86. It also doesn’t much care what the guest operating system is – vSphere will support 24 of them to Microsoft’s six – or what the application stack consists of.

A single logical resource pool or cloud-scale “compute plant,” as VMware calls it, can stretch to 32 physical servers with up to 2,048 processor cores, 32TB of RAM, 16PT of storage, 8,000 network ports and 1,280 virtual machines.

And vSphere virtual machines are also supposed to be more powerful than last-generation VMware virtual machines.

Each one can, for instance, support 2x the number of virtual processors for a total of eight; 2.5x more virtual NICs for a total of 10; 4x more memory up from 64GB to 255GB; 3x the network throughput; and 2x the maximum recorded IOPs pushing the max to over 200,000.

VMware claims that a single VM can handle 5x Visa’s annual global payment processing traffic. vSphere is also supposed to be able to handle eBay’s daily web traffic on a single server.

VMware claims that any application, meaning both existing enterprise apps and next-generation apps, will run more efficiently on the stuff and with guaranteed service levels.

It says even resource-intensive apps like large databases and Microsoft Exchange can be deployed on private clouds.

The widgetry includes zero-downtime/zero-data loss fault tolerance – thanks to a shadow copy on another server in the cluster – disk-based backup and recovery, application-level security policies and a vNetwork Distributed Switch to oblige Cisco that’s supposed to make networking easy to configure and provide visibility inside the box.

vSphere is also supposed to future-proof users. Infrastructure 3 could reportedly support up to six physical cores on a processor. vSphere should be good for 12 when and if that happens in its lifetime.

VMware’s carved vSphere up into six editions, each with successively more functionality, starting with a low-end vSphere Essentials priced at $995 for three physical servers, or $166 per processor.

Essentials is followed by the $2,995 Essentials Plus, which covers the same three servers but adds high-availability and data protection.

It’s supposed to be the only virtualization product that provides built-in availability, data protection, patch management and customizable alerts and reports at the price VMware will be asking.

The higher-end data center widgetry runs $795 per processor for vSphere Standard, $2,245 per processor for vSphere Advanced, $2,875 for vSphere Enterprise and $3,485 per processor for the full-blown Enterprise Plus with all the latest bells and whistles.

With Infrastructure 3 the entry point started at $495 per CPU and topped off at $2,875.

Infrastructure 3 customers with valid support and subscription contracts can upgrade for nothing. VMware is interested in moving its installed base onto the new widgetry. So it’s offering time-limited promotions for existing Infrastructure 3 to upgrade to vSphere editions over and above what they’re entitled to under their contracts.

VMware says that to get the whole megillah up and running would take three-six months in a data center considerably advanced down the virtualization path but it only knows that anecdotally.

Despite crippling losses, filing for Chapter 11, massive job cuts, the abrupt departure of its CEO and CFO, a search for somebody to buy it or merge with it, incapacitating debt, delisting threats and a patent suit, Spansion, the spun-off former AMD-Toshiba joint venture, has finally reached the jumping-off point it’s been aiming to get to for a couple of years now. It’s going to try to disrupt the industry by substituting NOR Flash for conventional server main memory.

This is not the NOR that goes into cell phones.

This is enterprise-grade NOR in a DIMM form factor, stuff that Google, Facebook and all the top sites are reportedly looking at.

It’s meant to solve the problem of today’s typical x86 servers not being able to support the giant datasets people are currently trying to force down their throats because of their limited DRAM capacity, a solution other than simply throwing more poorly utilized servers at the problem.

Spansion’s widgetry is called EcoRAM and it’s supposed to be way faster, cheaper and cooler than DRAM in read-intensive environments.

Forget write-intensive situations, they’re not NOR’s strong suite but Spansion claims an outrageously high 60x performance improvement – sweet Lord, 60x – on oil and gas modeling and visualization applications, for instance.

The Stanford Exploration Project, the industry-funded research consortium, used it to reduce the processing time on multi-terabyte datasets and was reportedly able to visualize half-terabyte datasets on typical x86 servers for the first time. Stanford said the data reorganization step in its processing flow was cut from 22 hours to 22 minutes.

EcoRAM is supposed to be the first technology to make near real-time analysis possible.

It’s also supposed to improve the performance of certain read-intensive Internet applications – like search and social networking – up to a whopping great 50x – to repeat 50x, numbers nobody’s used to – over tradition DRAM + hard drive server platforms.

EcoRAM expands main system memory eight-16 times the capacity of a typical x86 server and with as much as half-a-terabyte – that’s 512GB – of EcoRAM data doesn’t constantly have to shuffle back and forth between the hard disk and the DRAM. Instead large datasets are stored directly in the Flash memory, speeding up performance because the data is hugging the CPU.

And with maybe as much as an 8:1 consolidation rate, EcoRAM releases a considerable amount of data center real estate and saves an awful lot of TCO.

Then figure a 4GM DRAM DIMM needs 10W of power. Spansion says its 32GB EcoRAM DIMM only uses 10W of power.

The company claims a 75% reduction in energy costs over four years, a 75% reduction in footprint and a 45% reduction in CAPEX for an overall TCO reduction of 65%.

It figures 1,250 of its servers each fitted with 128GB of its widgetry can replace 5,000 traditional servers each fitted with 32GB of DRAM.

Spansion currently has two server OEMs, Virident Systems and Appro, exploiting the widgetry. Virident, a start-up that Spansion owns a piece of, is optimizing those two web favorites, MySQL and Memcached, with the widgetry (see separate story). And Appro is going after the HPC and oil and gas markets with two-socket and four-socket systems. Figure up to 256GB of EcoRAM in the first and 526GB in the second.

Spansion is also supposed to be working with other server OEMs applying EcoRAM to Hadoop clusters. Hadoop is the increasing popular open source framework used in Internet server clusters to reorganize and analyze huge and fast-changing datasets.

EcoRAM is now available in capacities of 32GB per DIMM. The widgetry currently works only on AMD boxes.

Jan Silverman, the VP of Spansion’s Server & Storage Business Unit, said that when Spansion started on its adventure “Intel was not a good choice.” Intel still had that old-fashioned bus and Opteron’s HyperTransport widgetry brought something to the party. Since Intel is currently on top that’s going to have to change for Spansion to make a real impression.

EcoRAM is compatible with a number of 64-bit Linux applications. To support Windows, Microsoft is going to have to be persuaded to make a few changes in its operating system, Silverman said.

Since it’s best at read-intensive situations, Spansion figures that makes it ripe for analytics, bioinformatics, business intelligence and the government besides the Internet and oil and gas.

The widgetry supports read latencies in the hundreds of nanoseconds, which makes it competitive with DRAM latencies, 10,000 times faster than hard drives and maybe as much as 100x times faster that state-of-the-art solid state drives.

Spansion says read bandwidth reaches up to 2.2 GB/s, which is 20x your typical 100 MB/s enterprise-class hard disks. Write performance is supposed to be comparable to high-speed enterprise-class hard disks, which are in the hundreds of MB/s.

The widgetry includes an accelerator – which lets servers address EcoRAM like it was DRAM – and Linux driver software. Spansion is currently using CentOS. It’s waiting for certification on Red Hat and SUSE.

The company says its EcoRAM architecture – which still calls for DRAM DIMMs because the server’s operating system and apps run faster out of DRAM – was designed to leverage upcoming high-speed connectivity solutions from both Intel and AMD.

Silverman said OEMs should figure the price of a 32GB of EcoRAM coming in under the going rate for an 8GB quad-ranked ECC DRAM on a per gigabyte basis. Spansion’s goal is to get it below 4GB.

According to IDC, the Internet and analytics market for x86 servers will reach $5 billion this year.

Spansion Claims Breakthrough in Main Memory
So Oracle’s Gonna Screw with IBM Huh…
VMware’s Newfangled Cloud OS Positioned for Takeoff
Virident Pitches GreenCloud Servers at Internet Greats
EC Evidently Aims To Hang Intel High
Sun’s Largest Stockholder Sells Out Early
AMD Gets Testosterone Shots, Revs Chip Schedule
Sun’s GlassFish & Friends To Swim in Amazon’s EC2 Tank
HP Takes On Cisco
Sun To Monetize its Cloud with Zuora
Need Money? Ask Your Mama
Sun Supports Google Apps Premier Edition Users
Microsoft Revenues Down 6%, Profits Down 32%
VMware Predicts Rough Going Ahead
Bottom? Bottom? What Bottom Where?: AMD
There’s Gonna Be 700 Fewer Yahoos in the World
Recession Costs IBM
Data Warehouse Appliance Launches
MySQL Steps on Larry’s Toes
Innobase Embedded Version
Sun & Oracle Dumbfound Microsoft, IBM
It’s Larry’s Problem Now
Sun Folk Advised To Update their Resumes
What Becomes of Scooter?
Oracle Iron
Larry, Open Source and the Anti-Christ
Who’s Next?
Satyam To Stay Free-Standing
IBM Gets Cloud Contract
Obama Names First US CTO
Asia PC Shipments Down
OLPC Dumps AMD
Yahoo & Microsoft Reportedly Still Talking
And That Cloud Costs What?

Well, if rebuffing IBM’s $7 billion offer as too low the weekend before last was a negotiating tactic then the gambit has blown up in Sun’s face according CNBC.

Following a Bloomberg story saying Sun wanted IBM to come back to the table – a story that made no mention of price – CNBC rustled up its own sources who told the cable channel that IBM had washed its hands of the whole affair.

First CNBC heard IBM wouldn’t touch Sun now with a 10-foot pole having been told by the Justice Department, the SEC and the European Commission that it would be in for a six-nine month review that would mean financial and business practice disclosures that IBM is not prepared to make, preferring to lie low and not attract attention.

CNBC said it was told Sun had reached out to IBM in a letter Tuesday offering to be utterly flexible on price and terms.

IBM had reportedly not told Sun it wasn’t interested when CNBC ran with its story.

Bloomberg had reported that – trapped in a dark alley with nowhere else to go – Sun was ready to restart takeover talks with IBM provided IBM put more starch in its commitment to actually close the deal despite whatever regulatory hurdles it had to vault.

Supposedly IBM had trimmed the price it was willing to pay to about $9.40 a share after due diligence and after being asked for guarantees that it would acquire Sun no matter what trouble the pair run into with the regulators.

Sun was supposedly willing to take a lower price of $9.55, down a dollar, in exchange for such an undertaking.

The Sun board was reportedly split over whether or not to accept the IBM offer with chairman Scott McNealy supposedly leading the nays. Presumably it would have been stupid to accept if the deal might not have gotten done.

CNBC said Sun then reached out to other companies again and got nowhere.

It reportedly talked to HP, Dell, Intel and Cisco. Cisco CEO John Chambers said Wednesday in Korea that if Cisco was interested it “would probably have already moved.”

CNBC said the problem would have been the server market share that IBM would have had. Combined with Sun it would have been something like 42%, enough to set off the European Commission.

CNBC also claimed that after doing due diligence the competitive position IBM would have had vis-à-vis HP with its 30% share of the server market didn’t look as attractive as it did going in.

Then CNBC came back with a different story. It said that IBM was an old hand at getting acquisitions past regulators and that wasn’t the REAL deal breaker. The REAL deal breaker was those executive contracts that Bloomberg eluded to days ago, the ones we said would get stockholders’ hackles up.

According to CNBC “The deeper issue is something IBM discovered during the due diligence process: A series of unusually structured contracts that Sun has with many key partners. Further, there’s a ‘change of control provision’ in many key executive contracts that Sun apparently was unwilling to unravel, and that was one of the reasons why IBM walked. I’m told this isn’t a ‘golden parachute’ or ‘poison pill,’ but simply a provision that forces the buyer to shell out tens of millions of dollars to a small group of Sun executives if the company is acquired. When IBM said it would have to lower the price of its offer to accommodate for that provision, Sun said no.”

Wall Street is still hopeful since Sun’s stock price was up 4.4% Thursday to $6.40.

CNBC however says it heard that McNealy wants to make a Michael Dell-like return as CEO and that unless Sun is willing to rewrite those employment contracts and take $9.40 a share IBM’s outta here.

IBM’s reported interest in Sun and its baggage still befuddles many in the computer industry particularly at the price being quoted.

The racks and racks and racks of commodity servers that make the Web 2.0 world and now the cloud possible are really lousy at it.

They’re slow, underutilized, don’t scale worth a hoot, eat power and space, and now they’re multi-core. They need extensive data partitioning, application-level mapping, caching, replication/recovery and load balancing.

Eighteen months or so ago CMEA Capital and Redpoint Venture threw $15 million at the problem of Internet-bound non-application-specific commodity hardware.

They underwrote a Menlo Park start-up called Schooner Information Technology that its founders had initially bootstrapped that thinks it can easily be a billion-dollar or multibillion-dollar company.

With the money, Schooner, which is just breaking cover now, built a couple of data access appliances, the start of a family of solutions meant to cut the Internet data center’s spiraling costs, absurd complexity and obscene power consumption.

It also filed 11 patents on its approach, which focuses on key middleware that wasn’t designed for parallelism and creates a new user-transparent operating environment that controls DRAM and processor threads.

The widgets promise 8x performance improvements over traditional servers – meaning one Schooner widget can replace eight conventional server – at an eighth the power and real estate requirements and 60% lower TCO – which is obviously why Schooner thinks it’s gonna be stinking rich.

One of the two appliances is also 100% compatible with existing MySQL deployments.

Schooner’s architecture integrates enterprise-grade flash memory, Intel’s newfangled multi-core Nehalem processors, low-latency interconnects with Schooner-optimized versions of the open source MySQL database and the open source Memcached high-performance distributed memory object caching system.

The Memcached appliance accelerates dynamic web applications by alleviating the database load. The MySQL appliance consolidates MySQL servers, addressing scaling and administrative overhead.

Both gadgets, run on CentOS, are fitted out with a half a terabyte of flash, 64GB of DRAM, 10Gb Ethernet and 16-thread Ethernet.

The Memcached device features instantaneous and transparent data persistence, data replication and data recoverability. And with multiple container support, a single appliance can be divided into separate Memcached domains.

The MySQL appliance, which is optimized for OLTP as well as OLAP, is said to process 400,000 transactions a minute where legacy disk storage hits only 40,000.

Schooner is using one of the new 2U dual-socket quad-core Nehalem servers that IBM just announced as its base platform. Seems IBM’s Venture Capital Group brought the two together. IBM is also going to distribute and support the appliances under a joint brand. Otherwise the Schooner widgets will be sold direct.

Schooner was started by Dr John Busch and Dr Tom McWilliams. Busch, now Schooner’s CEO, used to be director of research into computer system architecture and analysis at Sun focused on chip multiprocessing, advanced multi-tier clusters for Internet deployment and advanced HPC systems.

McWilliams, now the start-up’s CTO, founded PathScale, which developed a low-latency, high-bandwidth InfiniBand interconnect, and was acquired by QLogic. Before that interlude, McWilliams was a Distinguished Engineer and Principal Investigator at Sun working on server architecture and advanced CAD tools. He had also run microprocessor development and architecture at SGI when SGI boxes ran on Mips chips and systems architecture at Amdahl having designed the Key Computer superscalar pipelined box that Amdahl acquired.

Busch and McWilliams have collected a team from IBM, HP, Sun, Oracle, VMware and Amazon, who, like themselves, invented a lot of widgetry that the industry is based on and is aces at architecture modeling.

The appliances are currently in beta testing workloads and will be available at the end of May for $45,000 a throw.

Schooner calculates that its MySQL appliance can save roughly $1.6 million in TCO (less 62%) over three years in a typical mid-size 5TB Web 2.0 data center where 13 of the things would replace 102 conventional x86 servers.

In the same 5TB data center, the Memcached appliance is projected to save roughly another $1.6 million (less 52%) in TCO over three years. Twenty Schooner appliances would replace 167 conventional servers.

Ex-Sun Scientists Build Cloud Boxes around IBM Servers
McKinsey Slams the Cloud
IBM Doesn’t Want Sun: CNBC
Google’s Growth Engine Wheezing
Microsoft’s First Cloud Server Hits Public Beta
EMC Creates Monster Cloud Storage
Intel Calls a Bottom
HP Takes US Crown Away from Dell
Infobright Aims To Challenge MPP Data Warehouses
BT Venture Buys Control of Satyam
HP Revs HP-UX
Larrabee Due Early 2010
Cast Iron Protects Corporate Data on Google Cloud
Start-up Seeks To Exploit Memcached Market
Dell Seeks To Benefit from Sun’s Dilemma
Another Microsoft Enemy Joins EC Complaint
eBay To Dump Skype
Cupcake Betas
Novell Client for Windows Revved
VMware’s Big Day
Yahoo & Microsoft Talking Again: Reports
Layoffs To Hit Yahoo
Discovery To Delay AMD v Intel Trial
Google Open Sources Omaha
DOJ Wants Microsoft Oversight Lengthened
VC Named to Dell Board
Microsoft Loses its Data Center Boss
Cisco Acquiring Colocation Space: Report
Microsoft To Accelerate IE8 Distribution
Cisco To Put R&D Center in Korea
Satyam Asks To Be Delisted
Mainstream Support Ends for XP, Office 2003
Novell Names Two to its Board
IBM Layoffs To Hit Europe: Report

Buttressing its move into servers in search of a new revenue stream, network equipment maven Cisco is buying privately held Tidal Software for roughly $105 million in cash and retention incentives, hardly a rounding error for the wealthy Cisco.

Cisco says Tidal’s intelligent application management and automation solutions will advance its data center aspirations and let it dangling operating saving in front of customers.

Tidal manages SAP, PeopleSoft, Oracle E-Business Suite, .NET and Java applications and schedules database and CRM workloads. Tidal’s recent development deal with SAP to integrate Tidal with SAP’s Solution Manager lifecycle management is evidently important.

Cisco says Tidal will let it follow transaction flow, which it can already analyze on the network, into the application and ultimately optimize solution by determining if hiccups are network-, system- or application-related.

Tidal has a boutique-set of specialized or edgy skills that are nowhere near the systems management abilities of a BMC, which is partnering with Cisco on its newfangled Unified Computing System (UCS) or, come to think of it, a CA or IBM Tivoli, all of which can be integrated with Tidal.

In a statement the company said, “Tidal Software’s intelligent solutions will bolster Cisco’s data center strategy by providing timely, accurate and cost-efficient management and automation of application performance across entire business operations, from the server through the network to the desktop.”

It also says the acquisition will create significant opportunities for partner-led services.

Tidal will become part of Cisco’s Advanced Services organization when the deal closes sometime before the end July.

It raised at least $16.5 million in venture capital from JPMorgan Partners, Novus Ventures and VantagePoint Venture Partners over the last 11 years.

Google’s now year-old App Engine infrastructure, previously limited to running only programs written in a particular species of Python, a less-than-mainstream tongue but an internal Google favorite, is learning to accept programs written in Java.

With the move, Google is reaching out to a broader base and interfacing with what it acknowledges are “businesses’ existing technologies.”

Apparently Google is using JVM 1.6 which means it should be able to support Ruby on Rails too.

App Engine’s masters say Java was the first and most popular feature requested and that those requests extended to the other programming languages that have been implemented on top of the Java virtual machine along with the web frameworks and libraries.

It seems that marrying Java to Google’s infrastructure is no mean feat. Google is currently testing the outcome. It can’t guarantee that all the tons of Java code out there, particularly the stuff that ignores sandboxing, will work. It says, “We know that there will be some rough edges when it comes to compatibility.”

To smooth those rough edges out, it’s giving the first 10,000 interested developers a Java preview, looking for feedback.

The widgetry apparently wraps current App Engine APIs with Java standards like the Java Servlet API, JDO and JPA, javax.cache, and javax.mail. It also provides a secure sandbox that’s flexible enough for developers to break abstractions at will.

The widgetry is supposed ensure easy deployment of Java code to all standard J2EE servlet containers including WebSphere and Tomcat.

Google says instead of using the underlying App Engine datastore APIs, developers can program against Java Data Objects or the Java Persistence API as a way to deal with App Engine’s proprietary BigTable database.

Early support includes a Java runtime and integration with a new App Engine-friendly version of Google Web Toolkit 1.6 for turning Java into JavaScript and Google’s Plugin for Eclipse.

Google says these tools provide a unified development experience for writing AJAX apps in a single language from client to server.

Meanwhile, as Google pours Java all over Apps Engine, it’s also more quietly revving Python to make it faster under a project called Unladen Sparrow, a Monty Python reference.

According to a company blog – and having nothing to do with Java – App Engine has also added centrally managed access to on-premise corporate data and applications locked behind the company firewall complements of what’s called Secure Data Connector (SDC), another serious play to put the enterprise in the clouds. It will work with Google Docs and Google Gadgets. The data is reportedly encrypted.

Oracle said its Siebel CRM apps will support SDC, opening the door to next-generation SaaS applications, multi-tenancy support and an “in-the-cloud Internet-based environment.” It’s also got an Oracle Gadget Wizard for Google Apps for its CRM.

There is also so-called Cron support for App Engine to automatically schedule tasks like report generation or DB cleanup at user-specified times and the ability to batch-import gobs of data from conventional databases into BigTable. Google hopes to provide matching export capabilities in the next month.

Google says in the year since App Eng was launched 150,000 developers have built 50,000 applications that now generate upwards of 100 million pageviews a day.

© 2012 LinuxGram Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha