Well, it’s finally happened. Microsoft, which has only sued two other companies for patent infringement in its whole life, is exercising its patent rights over Linux and suing TomTom, the Dutch-based portable GPS device house, for ignoring its pleas to license its patents like other GPS system makers have.

Actually Microsoft is suing TomTom on eight counts of patent infringement, five of which have nothing at all to do with Linux. But the other three do and that’s what’s bound to make a big noise.

In fact Microsoft is trying not to make too big a deal of the matter and is issuing statements saying, “Open source software is not the focal point of this action. The case against TomTom, a global commercial manufacturer and seller of proprietary embedded hardware devices, involves infringement of Microsoft patents by TomTom devices that employ both proprietary and open source software code.”

That’s hardly the point.

For years now Microsoft has claimed – over the loud protestations of the Penguinistas – that Linux infringes on its IP but it has never substantiated those claims in any way. This is the first time it has put some meat on the bone or even identified some of its claimed IP.

Besides filing suit Wednesday in federal court in its hometown of Seattle, Microsoft also took its case to the International Trade Commission (ITC) in D.C. asking that TomTom’s Chinese-made widgets be barred from U.S. shores.

It accuses TomTom of both direct infringement and induced infringement.

The stubby lawsuit is a dry, colorless affair that never mentions Linux; the 25-page ITC complaint, even in its redacted form, is more substantive. And the three “Linux” patents are the core of its complaint.

According to Microsoft’s story it has been chasing TomTom for over a year trying to get it to license its patents. That’s why its suit demands treble damages for willful and deliberate trespass.

The three provocative Linux-involving patents that Microsoft says TomTom is treading on are U.S. patents 5,579,517 and 5,758,352 both entitled “Common Name Space for Long and Short File Names” and 6,256,642 entitled “Method and System for File System Management Using a Flash-Erasable, Programmable, Read-only Memory.”

Microsoft explains to the ITC that TomTom’s GPS widgets run a version of Linux and that Linux “and/or the software applications supported by the operating system also provide the devices with additional functionality such as file system support for long and short file names, memory management for flash memory commonly used on such devices, and a platform for integrating and controlling various electronic components used with the portable navigation computing devices, such as other components in a vehicle.”

Microsoft says patents ‘517 and ‘352 “describe an innovative system that both supports long file names and maintains compatibility with file name system and applications that are aware of only short file names” so “a short file name system can read the directory entry containing the short file name but will ignore the directory entry (or entries) containing the long file name. A long file name system can access and manipulate these long file names and so in such a way as to ensure compatibility with the short file name system.”

Microsoft also explains that “file systems are the part of an operating system that manages files on a storage device. A common way of managing files is to use a hierarchical structure, often referred to as ‘folders’ or ‘directories.’ These directories contain files and often other directories or subdirectories. These traditional file systems were designed for ‘multiple-write’ devices rather than ‘single-write’ devices such as flash memory. The ‘642 patent describes a file system that supports the byte-addressable and block-erasable nature of flash memory, while providing support for a file system offering the functionality of traditional file systems.’

Microsoft says it uses ‘517 and ‘352 in Vista and XP (remember FAT16?) and ‘642 is used in Windows CE.

Microsoft also tells the ITC – in case the open source community thinks it’ll just get the patents declared invalid – that both ‘517 and ‘352 withstood re-examination by the Patent and Trademark Office. Both were issued in 1996 and reconfirmed 10 years later. Patent ‘642 dates to July of 2001.

There appear to be both Canadian and German counterparts to ‘517 and ‘352 that Microsoft has challenged.

TomTom declined to comment initially and then finally confided to Reuters that it rejected the claims and would “vigorously defend” itself.

Microsoft settled the two other patent infringement suits it brought out-of-court.-

Microsoft Sues TomTom’s Embedded Linux for Patent Infringement
Intel & Dell Move To Protect the Word ‘Netbook’
The Lights Flicker at Dell
Google’s App Engine Goes Commercial
HP To Resell Solaris on ProLiant
Cloud Start-up Fails,
Widgetry Goes to SAP
Microsoft Feels the Economic Pain, Shows Wall Street Where It Hurts
Google Wants To Bring the Horse to Microsoft Hanging
European Star Chamber Strikes Again
Citrix Makes Bomb Run on VMware
While Bullets Fly Around It, VMware Issues a Progress Report
Red Hat Sketches Out Its KVM Virtualization Plans
VMware Licenses Neverfail Technology
Bull Launches myVMBox
VMware Adds vShield Security Appliance
New CEO Remaking Yahoo in Her Image
Canonical Aims Koala at Amazon’s Cloud
Novell’s Net Income Off 36%
Gmail Crash Idles Workers
AMD To Get Istanbul Out on Time
Mips Joins Linux Foundation
Novell Cuts Deal with VMware

Red Hat and Microsoft, about as virulent a pair of enemies as has ever existed, threw a leash over their fire-breathing dragons long enough on Monday to announce a cooperative pact forced on them by their mutual users – folks who may be holding back from committing to virtualization ahead of a truce.

The companies say they’re going to support each other’s operating systems as guests on each other’s current virtualization schemes. Windows Server will be supported on Red Hat’s transient Xen virtualization and Red Hat 5 will be supported on Microsoft’s Hyper V widgetry.

What happens when Red Hat moves on to its own Qumranet-derived KVM hypervisor when it gets to RHEL 6.0 is unclear.

The way the détente works each company will join the other’s virtualization validation/certification program and test and validate each other’s operating systems on each other’s hypervisors so customers can get the mixed virtualization support they want.

It will take until sometime in the second half for all the work to be done and for Red Hat to produce the necessary drivers. Microsoft will also have Linux physical and virtual management tools.

The key point for Red Hat is that this interoperability deal contains no embarrassing patent or open source license concessions, like the two-year-old Microsoft-Novell deal that plucked Novell’s chestnuts out of the fire but made it something of a pariah with the open source set, a proviso that may or may not explain why it took the Microsoft and Red Hat eight months, as they admit, to negotiate the arrangement.

There are also no financial terms beyond the usual certification testing fees.

Microsoft’s IP demands supposedly short circuited other Microsoft-Red Hat interoperability discussions. There’s no IP sharing in this arrangement, according to Microsoft, so no patent licensing. It’s not giving anything up.

Red Hat’s VP of its platform business unit Scott Crenshaw calls the deal a “major step forward for the industry” while acknowledging that it is “rare that these two companies publicly work together.”

Microsoft and Red Hat are supposed to represent 80% of today’s virtualized operating systems according to IDC’s numbers, which is what makes the truce important.

The deal will cover folks with valid support agreements or current RHEL subscriptions who will be able to go to either company for support. Otherwise they can arrange per-call support.

Red Hat has a deal with VMware that validates RHEL on ESX but not with Citrix, which competes with Red Hat on XEN. Microsoft currently supports VMware, Novell, Citrix and Cisco.

Red Hat & Microsoft Temporarily Cage Their Fire-Breathing Dragons
Cisco, VMware & the California Project
Freescale Promises Android on Netbooks for Christmas
Zmanda Expands its Cloud Protection
Linux Phone ISV Trades Hands for Roughly $100m
Novell Buys IP
Ariba Open Sources ‘Killer Framework’
HP Numbers Worse-than-Expected
HP Cuts Salaries
Microsoft Unit Signs Up for Rackspace Cloud
Google a Microsoft-Like Monopoly: Obama’s Antitrust Chief
Google Sued for Antitrust
Intel Asks Court To Contain Nvidia
Second Time Proves a Charm for AMD
Nvidia Promises a $99 MID
Not All of WebSphere Can Ascend to Amazon’s Cloud
Toshiba’s Buying Fujitsu’s Drive Business
Microsoft To Open its Own Stores
Investment in SaaS Delivery House Rises to $56.5m
Vista Capable Suit Loses its Class Action Cachet
Call for Cloud Security Guidelines Heard
Microsoft Party to Office Virtualization
Apple Develops Brown Spots
Now All VMware Has To Do is Chow Down
Icahn Buys More Yahoo
HP & Ubuntu Cozy Up
NSF Underwrites Cloud Research
Dell Directors Bolt
IE8 Close
Red Hat Loses Board Stalwart
Google Loses Market Share

Mozilla – with its Firefox browser, a direct descendant of the Netscape browser that played such a pivotal part in the great antitrust suit that the Justice Department brought against Microsoft in 1998 – is throwing its support behind the European Commission’s replay of that suit charging Microsoft with illegally bundling its Internet Explorer browser with its Windows operating system, something that has been going on now since 1995.

Of course the complaint, brought by Opera, which has got maybe 5% of the European browser market, ignores the fact that Microsoft’s browser action in Europe dropped to 59.5% in November according to XitiMonitor, down five points in six months. Firefox was at 31.1%.

But, hey, this is payback time. Opera chairman Bill Raduchel was chief strategist at Sun at the height of Sun’s rabid anti-Microsoft campaign.

Since a statement of objections (SO) from the EC is as good as a conviction, Mozilla and its chairman Winifred Mitchell Baker, a lawyer herself and a graduate of the Netscape legal department, wants in on crafting the EC’s remedy.

Recall that the EC’s Media Player solution – making Microsoft produce a player-free version of Windows – went over like a lead balloon.

In a blog that Ms Baker wrote the other day (http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/) she says, “An effective remedy would be a watershed event; a poorly constructed remedy could cause unfortunate damage.”

She has offered – and the EC has reportedly accepted – Mozilla’s “enormous expertise” as a resource in designing a remedy and will be “reaching out to people I know with particular history, expertise and ideas.”

She describes it as an “extremely complex area, involving browsers, user experience, the OEM and other distribution channels, and the foundations for ongoing innovation.”

As an “interested third party” in the case, Mozilla would have access to the secret SO, get a seat at the table at the hearing that’s likely to be part of the process and stick its two cents in.

Baker’s position is that “the damage Microsoft has done to competition, innovation, and the pace of the web development itself is both glaring and ongoing” and that “the damage is so great that it makes it difficult to figure out an effective and timely remedy.”

Although Firefox has eaten into Microsoft’s market share she warns against reading much into it. It “does not indicate a healthy marketplace for competitive products.” Firefox is an “anomaly,” she says – the “single example of anyone ever regaining market share from a Microsoft monopoly” – and “a single anomaly does not indicate a healthy, competitive or innovative system.”

“Hundreds of millions of people use old versions of IE, often without knowing what a browser is or that they have any choice in the quality of their experience.”

The other reason in her mind for Firefox’ success is that Mozilla is a non-profit. “I am convinced,” she writes, “that we could not have been, and will not be, successful except as a public benefit organization living outside the commercial motivations. And I certainly hope that neither the EU nor any other government expects to maintain a healthy Internet ecosystem based on non-profits stepping in to correct market deficiencies.”

Cisco has taken a piece of a really ambitious grid-turned-cloud company in Oz called Majitek that intends to turn all the devices and systems in an entire city into money-making utility services.

This, it appears, is “intelligent urbanization,” especially in emerging markets, and is supposed to make for better city management, better quality of life and real economic development.

Cisco claims that it represents a “major market transition” and “whole new multibillion-dollar industry” considering that 500 million people will move to cities in the next five years and 60% of world’s population will be living in cities 10 years from now.

So it has just kicked off a global initiative to make the network “the fourth utility.”

Cisco figures it can capitalize on this mass migration and will focus initially on sustainable solutions for public safety and security, transportation, buildings, energy, healthcare and education.

Cisco’s chief globalization office Wim Elfrink is telling governments that a city of five million can add $15 billion in revenues and some 375,000 jobs over the next 20 years with intelligent urbanization.

It’s apparently talk like that’s gotten Cisco a memorandum of understanding with the city of Incheon in Korea to work on so-called “u-City” technologies and a pilot program with one of the states in India to use the city of Bengaluru as something of a Petri dish. Tata Consultancy Services will build a new practice to push the Cisco widgetry.

Anyway, getting back to Majitek, Cisco just went in on a $7.5 million B round in the Australian outfit whose other investor is Pierce & Pierce, an equity house.

Majitek is supposed to work with Cisco’s Globalization Center in Bangalore to refine its software platform for the real estate sector as well as transportation, smart grid and safety and security.

The company says its Service Delivery Platform can enable next-generation telecom companies, utilities and managed service providers to deliver any digital service to any digital device over any digital network, all managed through a single customer account and paid on a single bill.

Majitek is already taking its widgetry to Dubai and into the so-called connected real estate market. ‘

Dubai, it appears, is the epicenter of a multi-trillion-dollar Middle Eastern property industry and the company has just hired a new CEO, Bernie Devine, a property industry veteran with experience in Dubai who has designed and implemented operational infrastructures for developers of large buildings, campuses, gated communities and entirely new cities – mostly recently the iconic Palm Jumeirah, the man-made island in Dubai.

Meanwhile, a couple of weeks ago Cisco closed on another acquisition that will feature in its intelligent urbanization drive.

Richards-Zeta Intelligence has the middleware to translate building infrastructure data from power systems into an IT-friendly format that integrates with existing applications over the network.

Cisco’s already got or soon will have the Catalyst switches that can measure, report and reduce the energy consumption of IP devices such as phones, printers, laptops, video surveillance and wireless access points.

Buildings switches are due early next year – lights, elevators, air conditioning, heating, fire alarms, employee access systems – all with a low-carbon “EnergyWise” intent.

Cisco’s also got a couple of video surveillance acquisitions to throw into the mix.

Cisco Pushes ‘City-as-a-Service’
IBM Takes to Amazon’s Cloud
Mozilla Wants To Supply the Rope for Microsoft’s Hanging
MySQL Boss To Follow Co-Founders Out the Door
Sun Builds Open Source Stack Around GlassFish
Black Duck Get More Money, New CEO
Linux Mixed into Cuba Libre
Red Hat Fans the JBoss Flame
Okay, How Bad Is It?
Microsoft May Not Have a Product But It’s Got a Roadmap
Start-up Google-izing Office
Cisco-VMware Rumors Resurface
AMD Stumbles on Way to Joint Venture
Intel Spits in Chicken Little’s Eye
IBM Wheels Out New Cloud Unit
The Executive Suite at Salesforce Shrinks
When Virtualization Isn’t Virtualization
If You Squint, NetSuite Made Money
RightScale Follows Amazon EC2 to Europe
NEC To Abandon What Remains of its EMEA PC Biz
Voltaire Pushes InfiniBand Envelope
Ballmer Pushes Congress on Stimulus Bill
Intel Redesigning Belated Tukwila
Symantec CEO May Be Commerce Secretary Yet
Travel Budget Cuts Impact IDF
Red Hat Sales Guy Jumps to EnterpriseDB
CA Settles $200m Suit
Spansion Unit Files for Bankruptcy
Google CEO: Power Behind the Throne
Microsoft at 10,000 Patents and Counting
Meg Whitman Throws Her Hat in the Ring
Storage Hangs in There
Nvidia Revenues Down 60%

It’s beginning to look as though we may get to hear this year if the federal appeals court buys the idea that Novell owns Unix.

SCO’s appeal of the Utah district court’s 2007 summary judgment finding in Novell’s favor has been put on an expedited schedule by the US Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Denver.

That means that a decision could be handed down sometime in the fall.

The Denver court has told SCO that it can file its opening brief as soon as it’s ready; it doesn’t have to wait for the March 6 deadline SCO was seeking.

The Utah court even certified the record for the appeal Tuesday so there’s no stumbling block left to overcome.

As soon as SCO files, the clock will start on when Novell has to file its response brief. The rule in the 10th Circuit is 30 days. Novell has already asked for 60 days. Its foot-dragging didn’t go down well with the circuit court, which “discouraged” Novell “from filing any motion for extension of time within which to file its response brief.”

The court also disabused Novell of the idea that if it went ahead and did file for an extension it could get 30 days. The court said it would be “limited to a single extension of time of no more than 15 days.”

We’ll take a wild guess that Novell figured an extension would push out the hearing and perforce move the appeal court’s decision into next year. But that’s sheer speculation.

Anyway, the court also told SCO that it can file its retort to Novell’s response brief the day after Novell files it if it wants to. It also said it assumes SCO wants an expedited hearing and told SCO it can ask for one as soon as the appeal is fully briefed.

That suggests the appeal could be heard sometime this spring.

Judge Dale Kimball, the Utah justice who decided that Novell owns Unix – and so had every right to order SCO to drop its claims against IBM and Sequent for allegedly poaching Unix code and sticking it in Linux – has wracked up a long list of overturned decisions.

And his SCO decision is said to have a good chance of being overturned because Kimball ignored the basic rules of civil procedure in issuing a summary judgment in the first place.

Summary judgment is not supposed to weigh evidence, champion one side’s interpretation of the fact over the other’s, or decide that one set of witness is more credible than another. That’s what juries are for. And that’s why there’s going to be a lot of surprised lawyers if Kimball isn’t overturned.

He denied SCO the jury trial it was expecting so if his summary judgment is overturned SCO’s slander-of-title/breech-of-contract/copyright infringement case against Novell will go back to a jury in Utah and, if SCO wins there – and moot courts suggest it will – well then, the question of whether Linux stole Unix code will again be troubling Linux users, particularly IBM’s Linux users.

And given the state of SCO’s finances, or lack of them, it will probably think about resuscitating its Linux tax scheme.

If SCO loses the appeal, it’ll be pushing up daisies, if it isn’t already.

VMware is going open source.

It’s conjured up View Open Client, an open source client for virtual desktop infrastructure meant to be used by data centers for hosting user desktops and making personalized user desktops accessible from most any device all of the time.

The move pressures both Microsoft and the traditional PC makers. Gartner is currently projecting that approximately 50 million user licenses for hosted virtual desktops will be purchased by 2013 and that thin-client terminals will account for about 40% of user devices for hosted virtual desktop deployment.

VMware says access to the View Open Client source code will let folks optimize their devices for delivering personalized virtual desktops and accelerate the development and delivery of enterprise-style provisioning and management schemes.

The move is part of its vClient Initiative to deliver what it calls universal clients that follow users to any end point.

VMware is putting the code out under the relatively business-friendly Lesser General Public License 2.1 (LGPL v 2.1) at http://code.google.com/p/vmware-view-open-client/ with support through the View Open Client community there.

It says some of the features in the release support secure tunneling using SSL, two-factor authentication with RSA SecurID, Novell’s SLETC Add-On RPM package and a full command-line interface.

The expectation is a broader range of thin clients will be certified for VMware View, the security of existing thin clients will increase through secure tunneling and the cost of deploying virtual desktops drop.

Stealth Start-up Virtualizes Server Memory; Claims First Mover Advantage
VMware Open Sources Virtual Desktop Code
SCO’s Appeal Hits the Fast Track
MySQL Creator Finally Leaves Sun
IBM To Build World’s Most Powerful Computer
DOD Creates its Own Sourceforge
Brother Buys Linux Patent Protection from Microsoft
Canonical Aims at the Server
Amazon: The Developers’ Collections Agency
Lenovo Runs Red; CEO Out
Microsoft To Push Two Main Win7 SKUs
The Woz Gets a Job
Google Wants Out of AOL Deal
Citrix Claims to Cut the Cost of Desktop Virtualization
Dell’s Got a New Little Virtualization Friend, Xsigo
$10 Indian Laptop a Lot of Hooey
Yahoo Closes Pioneer Cloud Storage
Google Brings Down the Internet; Thank God for Yahoo
Ma.gnolia Dies; Takes User Data with It
Xenocode Upgrades
Appirio Gives Salesforce a Facebook Virus
RightScale & New Relic Deliver Rails Performance Management in the Cloud
Intel Sues its Insurance Company
CSC Kicks Off Cloud Initiative
Dell To Offer SUSE on Thin Clients
Sun Behind the Cloud
USPS Investigating Amazon
Novell Cuts 3%
Arthur Rock, Madoff Investor
Netbooks Salvage Europe’s Q4
Sun’s Board Changes
Symantec CEO Will Not Be Secretary of Commerce
Mike Homer Dead

© 2012 LinuxGram Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha